On Sun, March 1, 2009 5:10 pm, Chris A Rowley wrote: > Yes, that works fine now. Good. > I was wondering how we could get more working, non-computational (in the > classical senses) mathematicians more involved in > both wider (future?) uses of 'well-coded semantically-rich mathematical > information' and the type and organisation of the CDs needed to support > such new areas. This, of course, is the 81,502$ question ($64000US converted at Friday's rates). > But maybe this meeting is too early for that? It's probably too early to do that per se, but if this meeting can come away with a clear "OM and MathML HAVE converged", it will be a lot easier to start doing that.
With another hat on (see below) Olga and I are hoping to do something in this area. James Davenport Visiting Full Professor, University of Waterloo Otherwise: Hebron & Medlock Professor of Information Technology and Chairman, Powerful Computing WP, University of Bath OpenMath Content Dictionary Editor and Programme Chair, OpenMath 2009 IMU Committee on Electronic Information and Communication ^^^ this hat _______________________________________________ Om mailing list [email protected] http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om
