On Tue, March 31, 2009 4:00 pm, Jacques Carette wrote: > Probably not what the people on the OM list want to hear, but ever since Given that Content MathML and OpenMath are converging, why shouldn't we? > Maple 7 and Mathematica 5 (whatever was released in 2001, see > http://www.w3.org/Math/iandi/ for example), through MathML one can > 'translate' between the two systems. This is automatic via > cut-and-paste of MathML. > > The quality of the translation is depending on the quality of the MathML Indeed. If, as I suspected, the original poster was looking at converting programs from one to the other, then I suspect the quality is pretty poor. > services of each implementation. But I remember people demoing some > non-trivial cut-and-paste between these two products in 2002.
James Davenport Visiting Full Professor, University of Waterloo Otherwise: Hebron & Medlock Professor of Information Technology and Chairman, Powerful Computing WP, University of Bath OpenMath Content Dictionary Editor and Programme Chair, OpenMath 2009 IMU Committee on Electronic Information and Communication _______________________________________________ Om mailing list [email protected] http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om
