On Mon, February 14, 2011 9:10 am, Christoph LANGE wrote: > Dear Michael, > > I have a question related to the new roadmap. I noticed that you closed > a number of "OpenMath 3" Trac tickets as "outdated". I presume that the > new "OpenMath 2++" starts with the established OpenMath 2 schema and CDs > and everything else. From that point of view most of the "issues" we've > had with the "OpenMath 3" schema/CDs are indeed non-issues. But I could > well imagine that similar problems and design issues will occur again. > From that point of view I consider it problematic to "forget" all the > problems and half-done solutions we have had so far. > > What do you think? Or am I missing the point? "closed" is not the same as "deleted" - the record is still there, I believe, and can be re-opened/mined. The more likely problem is that no-one remembers that it's there, butIdon't see a solution to that.
James Davenport Lecturer on XX10190 and CM30070 Hebron & Medlock Professor of Information Technology, University of Bath OpenMath Content Dictionary Editor and Programme Chair, OpenMath 2009 IMU Committee on Electronic Information and Communication Engineering & Science Board, Council of the British Computer Society Federal Council, International Foundation for Computational Logic _______________________________________________ Om mailing list [email protected] http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om
