Hi, The SFP+ is a Cisco P/N 10-3105-01 is just not supported because it's not an Intel part :-)
Richard Skelton wrote: > Hi, > After setting the allow_unsupported_sfp = 1; > I now see :- > > Nov 28 20:59:46 myhost pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: > pciex8086,10fb (ixgbe) instance 0 irq 0x43 vector 0x64 ioapic 0xff > intin 0xff is bound to cpu 6 > Nov 28 20:59:46 myhost pcplusmp: [ID 805372 kern.info] pcplusmp: > pciex8086,10fb (ixgbe) instance 0 irq 0x44 vector 0x65 ioapic 0xff > intin 0xff is bound to cpu 7 > Nov 28 20:59:46 myhost pseudo: [ID 129642 kern.info] pseudo-device: > devinfo0 > Nov 28 20:59:46 myhost genunix: [ID 936769 kern.info] devinfo0 is > /pseudo/devinfo@0 > Nov 28 20:59:46 myhost ixgbe: [ID 398243 kern.notice] NOTICE: WARNING: > Intel (R) Network Connections are quality tested using Intel (R) > Ethernet Optics. Using untested modules is not supported and may cause > unstable operation or damage to the module or the adapter. Intel > Corporation is not responsible for any harm caused by using untested > modules. > Nov 28 20:59:47 myhost mac: [ID 469746 kern.info] NOTICE: ixgbe0 > registered > Nov 28 20:59:47 myhost ixgbe: [ID 611667 kern.info] NOTICE: ixgbe0: > Intel 10Gb Ethernet > Nov 28 20:59:49 myhost mac: [ID 435574 kern.info] NOTICE: ixgbe0 link > up, 10000 Mbps, full duplex > > I think the SFP+ are made by Cisco will get the P/N tomorrow > > What SFP+ P/N should I use? > > Dan McDonald wrote: >> Literally separate things with a space, AND end it with a semicolon: >> >> allow_unsupported_sfp = 1; >> >> Dan >> >>
_______________________________________________ OmniOS-discuss mailing list OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss