Am 31.01.17 um 00:15 schrieb Richard Elling:
On Jan 29, 2017, at 3:10 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote:

Hi,

just to wrap this up… I decided to go with 15 additional LUNs on each storage 
zpool, to avoid zfs complainign about replication mismatches. I know, I cluld 
have done otherwise, but it somehow felt better this way.

After all three underlying zpools were "pimped", I was able to mount the 
problematic zpool in my S11.1 host without any issue. It just took a coulpe of seconds 
and zfs reported approx 2.53MB resilvered…

Now, there's a scrub running on that zpool tnat is just happily humming away on 
the data.

Thanks for all the input, everyone.
may all your scrubs complete cleanly :-)
  — richard

Stephan
I'm on it! ;) So far it has been running smoothly, only giving a couple of read errors for a ZFS that is encrypted and to which ZFS I hadn't the keys at hand, but otherwise, it's running fine. It will take another 9 days, though to finish, running at 3x100MB/s…

Thanks,
Stephan

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
OmniOS-discuss mailing list
OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com
http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss

Reply via email to