Thanks Richard for your help. My problem is that i have a network ISCSI traffic of 2 MB/s, each 5 seconds i need to write on disks 10 MB of network traffic but on pool filervm2 I am writing much more that, approximatively 60 MB each 5 seconds. Each ssd of filervm2 is writting 15 MB every 5 second. When i check with smartmootools every ssd is writing approximatively 250 GB of data each day.
How can i reduce amont of data writting on each ssd ? i have try to reduce block size of zvol but it change nothing. Anthony 2017-09-28 1:29 GMT+02:00 Richard Elling <richard.ell...@richardelling.com>: > Comment below... > > > On Sep 27, 2017, at 12:57 AM, anthony omnios <icoomn...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > i have a problem, i used many ISCSI zvol (for each vm), network traffic > is 2MB/s between kvm host and filer but i write on disks many more than > that. I used a pool with separated mirror zil (intel s3710) and 8 ssd > samsung 850 evo 1To > > > > zpool status > > pool: filervm2 > > state: ONLINE > > scan: resilvered 406G in 0h22m with 0 errors on Wed Sep 20 15:45:48 > 2017 > > config: > > > > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > > filervm2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t5002538D41657AAFd0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t5002538D41F85C0Dd0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > mirror-2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t5002538D41CC7105d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t5002538D41CC7127d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > mirror-3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t5002538D41CD7F7Ed0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t5002538D41CD83FDd0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > mirror-4 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t5002538D41CD7F7Ad0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c7t5002538D41CD7F7Dd0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > logs > > mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t2d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > c4t4d0 ONLINE 0 0 0 > > > > i used correct ashift of 13 for samsung 850 evo > > zdb|grep ashift : > > > > ashift: 13 > > ashift: 13 > > ashift: 13 > > ashift: 13 > > ashift: 13 > > > > But i write a lot on ssd every 5 seconds (many more than the network > traffic of 2 MB/s) > > > > iostat -xn -d 1 : > > > > r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device > > 11.0 3067.5 288.3 153457.4 6.8 0.5 2.2 0.2 5 14 filervm2 > > filervm2 is seeing 3067 writes per second. This is the interface to the > upper layers. > These writes are small. > > > 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 rpool > > 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c4t0d0 > > 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c4t1d0 > > 0.0 552.6 0.0 17284.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0 8 c4t2d0 > > 0.0 552.6 0.0 17284.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0 8 c4t4d0 > > The log devices are seeing 552 writes per second and since sync=standard > that > means that the upper layers are requesting syncs. > > > 1.0 233.3 48.1 10051.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0 3 > c7t5002538D41657AAFd0 > > 5.0 250.3 144.2 13207.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0 3 > c7t5002538D41CC7127d0 > > 2.0 254.3 24.0 13207.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0 4 > c7t5002538D41CC7105d0 > > 3.0 235.3 72.1 10051.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0 3 > c7t5002538D41F85C0Dd0 > > 0.0 228.3 0.0 16178.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0 4 > c7t5002538D41CD83FDd0 > > 0.0 225.3 0.0 16210.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0 4 > c7t5002538D41CD7F7Ed0 > > 0.0 282.3 0.0 19991.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0 5 > c7t5002538D41CD7F7Dd0 > > 0.0 280.3 0.0 19871.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0 5 > c7t5002538D41CD7F7Ad0 > > The pool disks see 1989 writes per second total or 994 writes per second > logically. > > It seems to me that reducing 3067 requested writes to 994 logical writes > is the opposite > of amplification. What do you expect? > -- richard > > > > > I used zvol of 64k, i try with 8k and problem is the same. > > > > zfs get all filervm2/hdd-110022a : > > > > NAME PROPERTY VALUE SOURCE > > filervm2/hdd-110022a type volume - > > filervm2/hdd-110022a creation Tue May 16 10:24 2017 - > > filervm2/hdd-110022a used 5.26G - > > filervm2/hdd-110022a available 2.90T - > > filervm2/hdd-110022a referenced 5.24G - > > filervm2/hdd-110022a compressratio 3.99x - > > filervm2/hdd-110022a reservation none > default > > filervm2/hdd-110022a volsize 25G local > > filervm2/hdd-110022a volblocksize 64K - > > filervm2/hdd-110022a checksum on > default > > filervm2/hdd-110022a compression lz4 local > > filervm2/hdd-110022a readonly off > default > > filervm2/hdd-110022a copies 1 > default > > filervm2/hdd-110022a refreservation none > default > > filervm2/hdd-110022a primarycache all > default > > filervm2/hdd-110022a secondarycache all > default > > filervm2/hdd-110022a usedbysnapshots 15.4M - > > filervm2/hdd-110022a usedbydataset 5.24G - > > filervm2/hdd-110022a usedbychildren 0 - > > filervm2/hdd-110022a usedbyrefreservation 0 - > > filervm2/hdd-110022a logbias latency > default > > filervm2/hdd-110022a dedup off > default > > filervm2/hdd-110022a mlslabel none > default > > filervm2/hdd-110022a sync standard local > > filervm2/hdd-110022a refcompressratio 3.99x - > > filervm2/hdd-110022a written 216K - > > filervm2/hdd-110022a logicalused 20.9G - > > filervm2/hdd-110022a logicalreferenced 20.9G - > > filervm2/hdd-110022a snapshot_limit none > default > > filervm2/hdd-110022a snapshot_count none > default > > filervm2/hdd-110022a redundant_metadata all > default > > > > Sorry for my bad english. > > > > What can be the problem ? thanks > > > > Best regards, > > > > Anthony > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > > OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com > > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ OmniOS-discuss mailing list OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss