Roland Mainz writes: > Erm... why is the ksh93-integration project dragged into this discussion > and why is this particular topic dragged out of it's grave (again > (anyone remeber the "Cadaver Synod" [1] ? =:-) )) ?
It's here just to make the point that the distinction between ON and SFW is in build rules, and not in quality. In other words, we didn't choose to put ksh93 into ON because it would have suffered from poor quality had it gone into SFW. Thus, the previous poster's contention is simply wrong. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
