On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 07:58:43PM -0400, Richard Lowe wrote: > "Mark J. Nelson" <Mark.J.Nelson at Sun.COM> writes: > > > Will Fiveash wrote: > >> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 04:47:29PM -0600, Mark J. Nelson wrote: > >>> Yes, it should be. > >> > >> Okay, I created a defect CR for this. > > > > Thank you. > > > > My reply was a bit terse. I think that, for folks developing under > > onnv-gate, hgsetup is mostly defunct, because they ran it a long, long > > time ago. But that's inadequate reason to let it languish. > > I believe the reason it defaults that way is that, at least at the time, > the idea was that people would clone and pull under their own name, and > only putback as onhg, and the assumption that pull/clone were the more > common operations.
Is it a problem to pull/clone as onhg? -- Will Fiveash Sun Microsystems Inc. http://opensolaris.org/os/project/kerberos/
