On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 11:00 -0800, Danek Duvall wrote:
> Does anyone have any feeling for this? I'm tempted to implement the third
> option, and if people can't seem to figure it out, change it to the second,
> "diff-style" option, and see if it's any better. And that's probably what
> I'll do if I don't get a whole lot of response, so if you care, please
> speak up.
my immediate reaction is that it's going to be very confusing and
possibly very error prone if "-r r1:r2" means one thing to hg diff and
something subtly different to webrev.
I'd want webrev -r to operate on the exact same pair of revisions as hg
diff -r; the parentrevspec extension or something like it would seem to
be the way to go to get more expressiveness.
- Bill
