Evan Yan writes: > By definition, ON community is about the core operation system and > networking components. From this point of view, I guess IRM should be > part of ON.
I certainly agree with that part. It should be part of the ON _consolidation_. > Doesn't that count for the interest of ON community? By that reasoning, nearly every project that delivers through the ON consolidation potentially needs ON community endorsement. I don't think that makes sense. > So I think IRM should be endorsed by both of ON and Device Driver > community, maybe Performance community as well. As you wish; it was a question of scope and perhaps a nit to begin with. I don't think this is the right way to use the endorsement mechanism (communities are interest areas rather than arrangements of code), but since the discussion doesn't seem to be going anywhere useful, I'll not stand in the way. As a core contributor to ON, +0 from me. -- James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com> Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
