James Carlson wrote: > Milan Jurik writes: > > <snip> >>> to keep these changesets separate all the way up to a "push." >>> >>> >> As I wrote if CRs are splitted in suggested fix (bad that it isn't >> available on bugs.opensolaris.org) only regression hunting remains >> complicated a bit. So this policy should be enforced where possible. >> > > It's only _slightly_ harder. Look at the 'hg history' output for the > file of interest. Ignore CRs that are obviously unrelated. Examine > the ones that are. > In some cases we use other utilities to inference changes to files besides hg, for example, OpenGrok and webrev. In the case for Opengrok, it truncates all but the first line of comments in the changeset, so that the comments are of no relevance of the associated file at all. In the case for webrev, it lumps all the comments for every file thereby confusing the reviewer of which is the relevant CR. Just wishing we could have the functional and old behavior back.
A solution, as I think Milan already suggested, could include multiple changesets in a workspace, but alas this is cumbersome to manage (viz re-commits). But I'm sure someone will create a clever tool to easily manage multiple changesets in a ws, it's just a matter of time :) Shawn. -- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/on-discuss/attachments/20080926/09c3e080/attachment.html>
