Vladimir Kotal writes:
> I have somehow missed that sentence while adding the function to the
> list. It's certainly very weird to read sentence that right after the
> list containing strl*() functions.
Now it's a little worse -- it refers to strl* instead of the others
(it's the other two that have trouble; not strl*) and it's also a
sentence fragment. I'll suggest this instead:
"... all alter their first argument. Additionally, the
strcat() and strcpy() functions do not check for overflow of
the array."
In any event, it's wordsmithing, which I thought or expected was
something the man page writers would chip in. (Or don't changes like
this go through them anymore ... ?)
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
