????? ???????????? wrote: > Who is responsible for closing this bug? I submitted this RFE to work > on this. The scripts are replaced by executables where observability > is guaranteed by debugger, truss and dtrace.
Unlike many such anonymized messages out of bugster, this one actually has the engineer's name: > [ jbeck, 2009-Dec-02 ] > I am closing this as Will-Not-Fix, as the benefit in very minor disk > space savings is not worth the cost in reduced maintainability. Note > that I am not acting as a "lone wolf"; a large number of ON engineers > discussed this at lunch yesterday, at which there was strong consensus > that this would be a Bad Idea [tm] for the reasons I mentioned above. "jbeck" is john.beck at sun.com. I wasn't in on that discussion out in Menlo Park, and it probably should have been discussed on one of these lists, but I think I agree with the reasoning that there's no real point in doing this. -- James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W <carlsonj at workingcode.com>
