Last weekend I ran "pkg image-update" and updated the system to build 128,
downloaded the tip of the ONNV source tree using Mercurial, ran nightly to
build and Install to install. This time it works!

I wonder when "pkg image-update" is executed, how can we specify which build
we want to update to. I read the manual and info, which don't seem to give
me the answer. Is it something we have no control over?

Tian

On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Tian He <hnhetian at gmail.com> wrote:

> thanks a lot!
>
> tian
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:55 PM, Jonathan Adams <jonathan.adams at 
> sun.com>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 03:55:25PM -0800, Tian He wrote:
>> > > For what it's worth, I definitely recommend using bfu rather than
>> > > Install.  The latter is a bit faster, but unless you're positive that
>> > > you're modifying only kernel bits and that your new kernel _exactly_
>> > > matches the existing user space (including all the undocumented
>> > >
>> >
>> > I wonder how I can be absolutely sure of this. Is that something that
>> comes
>> > with years of experience?  Is there a recommended path to reach that
>> level?
>>
>> As a rule of thumb, I always BFU to (usually) the closest daily build
>> before using Install.  Being inside the Sun firewall, I have the advantage
>> of access to nightly builds generated by the ON gate staff, though.
>>
>> If I were doing a project outside SWAN, I'd use BFU the first time,
>> and then if my changes were kernel-only, Install to test intermediate
>> builds.  After syncing up with the gate, I'd run a non-incremental
>> nightly(1),
>> BFU the results, then Install from there.
>>
>> If your changes cross the U-K boundry, you typically know it;  the above
>> is mostly to save you from unexpected dependencies from *other* putbacks.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> - jonathan
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> One way leads to another
>



-- 
One way leads to another
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/on-discuss/attachments/20091207/b063d6b5/attachment.html>

Reply via email to