Will Fiveash wrote: > pkg:/system/security/kerberos-5 appears to bundle mostly things > associated with the KDC aspect of Kerberos and > pkg:/service/security/kerberos-5 is stuff associated with Kerberos > clients. There appear to be some anomalies with the contents however. > For example usr/sbin/kclient is in pkg:/system/security/kerberos-5 but > this should really be in pkg:/service/security/kerberos-5. There are > several other items that should also be moved around. What we are > unsure however is what was thought behind the original construction of > these packages contents?
system/security/kerberos-5 came from SUNWkdc service/security/kerberos-5 came from SUNWkrb I don't think they were modified in any way -- kclient was in SUNWkdc, for instance. > Can we reorganize these packages into everything needed by krb clients > into one package and the additional stuff to provide KDC support in the > other or would that violate some new pkg standard? No, that would be welcome, and I believe that . Split them up however you please. > And if we do this it would be good if we could rename the packages to > reflect this. Yes. Having security/kerberos-5 under both system and service is just a pain, but the folks doing the rename ultimately didn't have much input from the relevant teams and had a massive number of packages to try to coordinate, so things like this ended up happening. Danek _______________________________________________ on-ips-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/on-ips-dev
