Is there a normative set of RFCs/standards that we plan to adhere to for the YANG work in ONAP? I’m asking as an observer (without specific YANG expertise :-) wanting to make sure we pave the way for a coherent developer experience moving forward.
The ONAP Wiki references RFC 6020<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6020.txt> (YANG 1.0) -- is this superseded (?) by RFC 7950<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6991.txt> (YANG 1.1)? And then there’s the JSON encoding proposed in RFC 7951<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7951>. It would be useful to consolidate around a consistent representation, given that different toolchains/consumers may need to interoperate. Is there a need to reference the various core data models (RFCs 6991<https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6991>, 7223<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7223.txt>, 7317<https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7317.txt>, and all their friends), or is their use otherwise clearly implied? There was discussion along these lines in the “VNF Management Requirements for OpenECOMP” document<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Reference+Documents?preview=%2F1015849%2F1017888%2FVNF+Management+Requirements+for+OpenECOMP.pdf>, which is seeded into the VNF Requirements project. Maybe the questions I’m asking (and those that Kedar posed previously) just ought to be referred to that workstream… Thanks! --Claude From: <onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> on behalf of "LANDO, MICHAEL" <ml6...@intl.att.com> Date: Wednesday, July 5, 2017 at 11:09 AM To: Kedar Ambekar <ake...@techmahindra.com>, "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>, "ROZIN, EDEN" <er4...@intl.att.com> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] YANG.XML format ***Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T *** Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more information. +Edan BR, Michael Lando Opensource & Frontend Team Lead, SDC AT&T Network Application Development · NetCom Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago ··········································································· Office: +972 (3) 5451487 Mobile: +972 (54) 7833603 e-mail: ml6...@intl.att.com<mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com> From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Kedar Ambekar Sent: Thursday, June 08, 2017 4:17 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] YANG.XML format Hi Michael, Couple of questions around YANG. 1. If I have YANG model from VNF Vendor in JSON format, can I use it in SDC ? Or it accepts only in XML format ? 2. Not remember where, but I read that ONAP SDC does not distribute YANG model to SDNC. Is this correct ? 3. If # 2 is correct, can YANG be fed directly to SDNC by invoking any API ? ODL API ? Thank you.. From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Lando,Michael Sent: Monday, June 5, 2017 3:56 AM To: Law, Owen <owen....@team.telstra.com<mailto:owen....@team.telstra.com>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] YANG.XML format The current guide line is that the file be a valid xml and that the file ending be.xml. No additional requirements/validations are done for this artifact. BR, Michael Lando Opensource & Frontend Team Lead, SDC AT&T Network Application Development · NetCom Tel Aviv | Tampa | Atlanta | New Jersey |Chicago ··········································································· Office: +972 (3) 5451487 Mobile: +972 (54) 7833603 e-mail: ml6...@intl.att.com<mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com> From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Law, Owen Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2017 2:35 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-discuss] YANG.XML format Hi ONAPers: There is an option in SDC to add deployment artefacts as part of the service composition – is there a specific guideline on what format is needed for the YANG.XML ? Regards Owen ============================================================================================================================ Disclaimer: This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may review the policy at http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.techmahindra.com_Disclaimer.html&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=FYvXSElfSmWIXOeZxWIxQysejuz9-TXmaL6uftBh8MY&m=R--ZI_iRaoBn-HH2hiFLvWRayidFxdhf6JlbghF3HN4&s=zuxLhU26Z-QENdqYywiQxyoHugmT9np_hi_N4HnJWyQ&e=> externally http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tim.techmahindra.com_tim_disclaimer.html&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=FYvXSElfSmWIXOeZxWIxQysejuz9-TXmaL6uftBh8MY&m=R--ZI_iRaoBn-HH2hiFLvWRayidFxdhf6JlbghF3HN4&s=XDy5dphHs4UEWk4Bd5WeR54dPgl9d7QZlpbj6JOwzJ4&e=> internally within TechMahindra. ============================================================================================================================
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
