Hi all, Thanks a lot to meeting's attendants.
Here is the meeting's summary. As there are also action items to all PTLs, I distribute it to the whole TSC list. I encourage PTLs and all potentially involved people to register to dedicated usecasesub list. 1. Doodle poll is created (and email is sent by Kenny) to see preference for Use case subcommittee meetings' occurrence - weekly or bi-weekly. All interested parties are encouraged to vote. 2. The highest priority now is to compete R1 use cases discussion. In parallel we should start working on R2 use cases. Thus, please start including your R2 use case description proposals under this created link: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Release+2+Use+Cases . We can then start email discussions in parallel to our meetings. 3. vCPE and vVOLTE use cases leaders have meetings with a different projects. The objective is to complete all use cases description with all flows and involved modules functionality by next week. Use cases leaders are requested to upload and distribute all meetings notes. The work is done and organized in a very close cooperation with Integration project. In case of a need, we may schedule dedicated meeting to review remaining points with projects this week a. vCPE: i. Still under discussion: 1. DCAE/Intel discussion to close packets' format (please involve Alok Gupta per his request) 2. Interactions with SDC will be further clarified 3. SDN-C functional extension will be discussed with SDN-C team 4. Onboarding of vCPE VNFs scenario - DCAE Telemetry issue will be clarified b. vVoLTE i. There is need to check legal process of commercial VNFs approval. Perhaps this is not needed as commitment is only for integration testing. In any case, we will ask Phil to help validating this issue ii. There is need to involve VNF requirements project to double check whether documentation of Open-O is merged with ecomp documentation to create a single set of guidelines iii. There is request to include model which drives the use case in the vVolTE use case description iv. A question on whether vIMS+vEPC is enforced as a single request coming from SO (i.e. as a single network service or not). It was clarified that it is up to implementation, as VF-C can support it both ways. The corresponding clarification should be included in the use case description v. Still under discussion: 1. SDC for design time functionality 2. SDN-C interaction with 3rd party controller 3. For overlay - whether Openstack or hardware will be used - discussions with Brian Freeman are initiated 4. PTL of projects with specific issues related to use cases implementation are requested to provide their questions in advance and also to attend Use case subcommittee meetings in such a cases. PTLs who has no clear information on what their project should implement per R1 use cases (and those projects are not mentioned under point 3 above) are requested to approach me ASAP. Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image001.png@01D2FA28.AC916010] This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer <https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
