Membership in a sub-committee is defined just above the proposed changes.  In short, it's up to the subcommittee in consultation with the TSC:
 
----------
Each subcommittee shall determine its own membership eligibility, in consultation with the TSC. It is
expected that subcommittee mem
bership shall be open to
all
ONAP Contributors; however,
subcommittees may impose restrictions such as the number of participants from a single company.
While the desire may be to keep its size and scope limited, each subcommittee
shall
be open to the
ONAP
membership. In particular, a Platinum member has the right to appoint its TSC representative
or a designate to such a subcommittee. Also, all elected TSC members are eligible to join a
subcommittee
Each subcommittee shall determine its own membership eligibility, in consultation with the TSC. It is
expected that subcommittee mem
bership shall be open to
all
ONAP Contributors; however,
subcommittees may impose restrictions such as the number of participants from a single company.
While the desire may be to keep its size and scope limited, each subcommittee
shall
be open to the
ONAP
membership. In particular, a Platinum member has the right to appoint its TSC representative
or a designate to such a subcommittee. Also, all elected TSC members are eligible to join a
subcommittee
Each subcommittee shall determine its own membership eligibility, in consultation with the TSC. It is expected that subcommittee membership shall be open to all ONAP Contributors; however, subcommittees may impose restrictions such as the number of participants from a single company. While the desire may be to keep its size and scope limited, each subcommittee shall be open to the ONAP membership.  In particular, a Platinum member has the right to appoint its TSC representative or a designate to such a subcommittee. Also, all elected TSC members are eligible to join a subcommittee
------
 
 
Regards,
Jason Hunt
Executive Software Architect, IBM

Phone: +1-314-749-7422
Email: djh...@us.ibm.com
Twitter: @DJHunt
 
 
----- Original message -----
From: Thomas Nadeau <thomas.nad...@amdocs.com>
To: Jason Hunt <djh...@us.ibm.com>, "stephen.terr...@ericsson.com" <stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>
Cc: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>, "onap-...@lists.onap.org" <onap-...@lists.onap.org>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] Draft of TSC Charter Section 5.4.1Changes
Date: Tue, Jul 25, 2017 8:32 AM
 

 

              What defines “subcommittee member”?  What is someone is not officially a “member” of any subcommittee?

 

              --Tom

 

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Jason Hunt
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 9:01 AM
To: stephen.terr...@ericsson.com
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-...@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] Draft of TSC Charter Section 5.4.1Changes

 

 

I support Steve's suggested change to 5.4.1.2 or something similar.

 

Also, for grammar reasons, I think 5.4.1.4 should read:

 

5.4.1.4   Voting for a Chair or Vice-Chair is not limited to member companies However, only 1 Subcommittee member from each company, or group of related companies (as defined in section 7.4 of the ONAP Project Charter) may vote in the election.   



Regards,
Jason Hunt
Executive Software Architect, IBM

Phone: +1-314-749-7422
Email: djh...@us.ibm.com
Twitter: @DJHunt

 

 

----- Original message -----
From: Stephen Terrill <stephen.terr...@ericsson.com>
Sent by: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org
To: Kenny Paul <kp...@linuxfoundation.org>, onap-tsc <onap-...@lists.onap.org>
Cc: "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] Draft of TSC Charter Section 5.4.1 Changes
Date: Tue, Jul 25, 2017 3:49 AM
 

Hi,

 

Thanks Kenny. 

 

To all, I have a few suggestions that we could consider.

 

Editorial:

 

After vice chair, we add where applicable) in 5.4.1.2.  So it becomes: Each subcommittee may elect a Chair or Vice-Chair (where applicable)  who is responsible for leading meetings and representing the subcommittee to the TSC.

Motivation: To address the comment that the “or” can be read that we only have a vice-chair.

 

Proposed extra addition.

5.4.1.5 The elected chair (and/or vicechair) is submitted to the TSC for confirmation.  The TSC decides to accept the outcome or requests a new voting.

Motivation:  The sub-committees are support to the TSC, and in addition this is inline with the idea that the sub-committees make recommendations not decisions.  This would mean that there is no exception to that rule.  This can also enable the TSC, if it was felt to be applicable, consider leadership aspects beyond what is considered in one forum for the health of the overall community.

 

Best Regards,

 

Steve

 

From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Kenny Paul
Sent: 24 July 2017 23:54
To: onap-tsc <onap-...@lists.onap.org>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-tsc] Draft of TSC Charter Section 5.4.1 Changes

 

The proposed changes to Section 5.4.1 have been posted to the TSC wiki page

 

Sorry for the delay but I did not have an editable version of Charter v.7.1 available to me to redlined and I got that this morning. 

 

What is reflected in the v7.2.1 draft are:

- numbering changes to facilitate a line-by-line vote as was recommended by Ed Warnicke

- a page break for the sake of readability

- the text discussed at the July 20th TSC meeting below:

 

5.4.1.2   Each subcommittee may elect a Chair or Vice-Chair who is responsible for leading meetings and representing the subcommittee to the TSC.

5.4.1.3   The Chair or Vice-Chair will be elected by members of the subcommittee as of the date the nomination process starts for the election.

5.4.1.4   Voting for a Chair or Vice-Chair not limited to member companies however only 1 Subcommittee member from each company, or group of related companies (as defined in section 7.4 of the ONAP Project Charter) may vote in the election.
    

 

Not reflected in this draft is language around from Rajesh Gadiyar, Susana Sabater and Bob Monkman around the diversity of participation in leadership positions.  

I did not include this as A) the language had been inadvertently omitted from the discussion and B) the intended scope of those provisions extends beyond the specific changes to the topic of Steering Committee elections to also include PTL and Community Coordinator roles.  I will with Susana, Bob and Rajesh on the specific language around that to be presented at the August 3rd TSC meeting.

 

Please let me know if you have any questions.

 

Best Regards, 
-kenny

Kenny Paul,  Technical Program Manager
kp...@linuxfoundation.org
510.766.5945

 

_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

 

 

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
 

_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to