Hi Jason
Yes rancher is optional even if it is really handy and it covers very well the 
kubernetes lifecycle (deployment config healing upgrade and even removal) and 
that being done without requiring any effort from the users and in a reasonable 
amount of resources.
Thanks
Jerome


-------- Original message --------
From: Jason Hunt <djh...@us.ibm.com>
Date: 2017-08-17 5:36 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: "Doucerain, Jerome" <jerome.doucer...@bell.ca>
Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org, onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org, Roger 
Maitland <roger.maitl...@amdocs.com>
Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [OOM] Kubernetes version to be used as reference

Rancher is optional, right?  I recall earlier that we wanted to support users 
who already have a Kubernetes environment installed.


Regards,
Jason Hunt
Executive Software Architect, IBM

Phone: 314-749-7422
Email: djh...@us.ibm.com
Twitter: @DJHunt




From:        "Doucerain, Jerome" <jerome.doucer...@bell.ca>
To:        Roger Maitland <roger.maitl...@amdocs.com>, 
"onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Date:        08/17/2017 04:21 PM
Subject:        Re: [onap-discuss] [OOM] Kubernetes version to be used as 
reference
Sent by:        onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org
________________________________



Hi Roger
Yes exactly Rancher v1.6.6+ and Kubernetes 1.7.2+
?that's what I had in mind.
Thanks
Jerome


-------- Original message --------
From: Roger Maitland <roger.maitl...@amdocs.com>
Date: 2017-08-17 11:35 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: "Doucerain, Jerome" <jerome.doucer...@bell.ca>, onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: RE: [OOM] Kubernetes version to be used as reference

Hi Jerome,

In general I strongly support going to the latest stable version at the 
beginning of a project like this one.

To refine this a bit, Rancher seems to be a popular choice for management of 
the infrastructure and it is heavily integrated to Kubernetes so we should 
consider it too.  The Rancher v1.6.6 release notes 
<https://github.com/rancher/rancher/releases/tag/v1.6.6>  state that Kubernetes 
1.7.2 is supported; are you recommending Rancher v1.6.6+ and Kubernetes 1.7.2+?

Thanks,
Roger

From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Doucerain, Jerome
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2017 1:19 PM
To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Subject: [onap-discuss] [OOM] Kubernetes version to be used as reference

Hi,

as we are using kubernetes to run ONAP containers, we are developing kubernetes 
manifests to describe the resources required by the ONAP components and the 
environment where we are running them on.

Some kubernetes resources we are referring to in the manifests are valid only 
in some kubernetes versions or the way to refer to those resources is specific 
to particular versions, taking into account the evolution as the kubernetes API.

So to keep the valuable material the community is bringing valid as long as 
possible, and as we are at the beginning of the ONAP on kubernetes story, my 
proposal would be to try to start with the most recent stable version of 
kubernetes (i.e. 1.7) and base the kubernetes manifests on the version 1.7 API 
reference.

It will also allow us to use the latest features of kubernetes to operate ONAP.

Could you please give some feedback on that.

Thanks

Jerome


Jerome Doucerain
Sr Consultant - System Architecture
Bell Business Markets
671, LaGaucheti?re Ouest, 5e
Montr?al (Qu?bec) H3B 2M8
Office : 514 870-6392
jerome.doucer...@bell.ca<mailto:jerome.doucer...@bell.ca>

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at 
https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss



_______________________________________________
onap-discuss mailing list
onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss

Reply via email to