Hi, Alexis, Sorry for the push. Could I get a timeframe for that? I would like the team to get hands on experience and based on that, making decision whether we’d like to keep both OOM and Heat for Beijing. My concern is how quick OOM could keep up with those new projects? (We are again need to make hard decision, keep both will need more resource for us).
Regards, Helen Chen From: <onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> on behalf of Alexis de Talhouët <adetalhoue...@gmail.com> Date: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 at 11:42 AM To: "FREEMAN, BRIAN D" <bf1...@att.com> Cc: "GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)" <ma...@research.att.com>, onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][oom] OOM readiness for Beijing release Brian, Yes, it does sound reasonable. That being said, I’m very much involved in finishing DCAE support in OOM. Once done, along with the testing the various use cases, I’ll sync up with Michael to provide a clear, straightforward documentation, both for setup and usage, providing tips and ways to debug. Thanks, Alexis On Jan 3, 2018, at 2:15 PM, FREEMAN, BRIAN D <bf1...@att.com<mailto:bf1...@att.com>> wrote: Gary, I think Michael was trying to be complete in describing options with a plan to do a cleaned up documentation after it was working and scripted up. Perhaps its time to formally start a new page with the final recommended – single path and scripted install (I agree that it was daunting at the start to find the latest parts/procedure which was much simpler than the first procedure) Michael/Alexis – is that reasonable ? Brian From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Gary Wu Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2018 1:16 PM To: PLATANIA, MARCO <plata...@research.att.com<mailto:plata...@research.att.com>>; Alexis de Talhouët <adetalhoue...@gmail.com<mailto:adetalhoue...@gmail.com>>; GILBERT, MAZIN E <ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>> Cc: onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][oom] OOM readiness for Beijing release My experience with OOM (excluding DCAE) so far is that SDC fails to pass health check about half the time. When this happens, the best solution seems to be re-deploying the entire ONAP again, and if you’re lucky it will work. This appears to have been observed by others as well. The good thing is that we can do the re-deploy in about 10 minutes (excluding DCAE). First impressions: * The system is highly dependent in using exact versions of everything: docker, kubernetes, helm, rancher, etc. If anything is slightly off, things would break, and it would not be obvious exactly what was wrong. As a result, it makes the system feel fragile. * The SDC intermittent issue above makes the OOM deployments feel not fully stable/repeatable yet. * The OOM “how-to” documentation has almost too much information, covering multiple options/paths that sometimes overlap (e.g. where to install Rancher server vs agent, whether to use the cd.sh or manually perform individual steps). This made it hard for a newcomer to discern which steps need to be run next given which other choices were made earlier, and it was also hard to figure out if any mistakes were made performing some prior steps. I was not able to find any information on how to deploy DCAE via OOM; the most I got so far was that the DCAE controller container was able to bring up about half of the expected DCAE VMs, but not enough to be able to pass the DCAE health check. Thanks, Gary From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of PLATANIA, MARCO (MARCO) Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2018 9:15 AM To: Alexis de Talhouët <adetalhoue...@gmail.com<mailto:adetalhoue...@gmail.com>>; GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) <ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>> Cc: onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][oom] OOM readiness for Beijing release I’ve been playing around with the OOM solution for a while and I was able to instantiate the vFW, vLB/vDNS, plus another dummy generic VNF that I created. I installed a minimal version of DCAE (only the collector and one CDAP container with the Threshold-crossing microservices) to run closed loop, waiting for the whole DCAE platform to be ready. I wasn’t able to run closed loop yet, perhaps due to out-of-sync configuration in my environment. I’m trying to fix this and see how far I can go with closed loop. Marco From: <onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org>> on behalf of Alexis de Talhouët <adetalhoue...@gmail.com<mailto:adetalhoue...@gmail.com>> Date: Wednesday, January 3, 2018 at 11:36 AM To: "GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)" <ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>> Cc: onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [integration][oom] OOM readiness for Beijing release Mazin, So far, that I’m aware of, a few ppl from various company have tried OOM Amsterdam, and have successfully deployed vFWCL. If you want names and email, I guess I can find them for you. We’re currently testing vFWCL close loop with DCAE being deployed by OOM; I’d say it’s 80% done. Thanks, Alexis On Jan 3, 2018, at 11:21 AM, GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E) <ma...@research.att.com<mailto:ma...@research.att.com>> wrote: Thanks Roger. Have there been other groups who have managed to bring up Amsterdam with OOM (with and without DCAE)? Can you point me to any so I can understand their experience. mazin On Jan 3, 2018, at 11:15 AM, Roger Maitland <roger.maitl...@amdocs.com<mailto:roger.maitl...@amdocs.com>> wrote: Hi Helen, David is on vacation so I’ll answer - OOM is ready. The OOM team has been working with the Integration team and the entire ONAP community to create the amsterdam<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_gitweb-3Fp-3Doom.git-3Ba-3Dshortlog-3Bh-3Drefs_heads_amsterdam&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=_dlaJi5cUYGfdQpkrTvOLmwKf9nHldPQl5dmZYtz2iQ&s=uYM-V22L0V1EhonUacGlX4_i-MF4XdWNLtYWzReGYA4&e=> release of OOM which is now available. There is a continuous delivery system that deploys the master branch of all of the ONAP components with OOM – here<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__kibana.onap.info-3A5601_app_kibana-23_dashboard_AWAtvpS63NTXK5mX2kuS-3F-5Fg-3D-28refreshInterval-3A-28display-3AOff-2Cpause-3A-21f-2Cvalue-3A0-29-2Ctime-3A-28from-3Anow-2D24h-2Cmode-3Aquick-2Cto-3Anow-29-29-26-5Fa-3D-28description-3A-2527-2527-2Cfilters-3A-21-28-29-2Coptions-3A-28darkTheme-3A-21f-29-2Cpanels-3A-21-28-28col-3A1-2Cid-3AAWAts77k3NTXK5mX2kuM-2CpanelIndex-3A1-2Crow-3A1-2Csize-5Fx-3A8-2Csize-5Fy-3A&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=e3d1ehx3DI5AoMgDmi2Fzw&m=TEGneiYu3X69Tbakkf-0jbhukaSEN5O-Dj-rwTm4eXY&s=HXzlpENhYHSnNMtU61IUybmlPUBxj2VxcRYHbRcCRJw&e=> is the dashboard. As this system is effectively continuously evaluating ONAP health this should be very useful for the Integration team to quickly identify component submissions that result in a degradation. The initial version of DCAE support is under final testing. This version brings up the DCAE controller which then brings up the rest of the DCAE VMs. There is a discussion scheduled for tomorrow between the OOM and DCAE team on a more fully containerized solution. The OOM team is also working on deploying OpenStack DNS Designate to simply the deployment of OpenStack infrastructure required for DCAE. We’ll let the community know when this is ready. Cheers, Roger From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Yunxia Chen Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2018 5:25 PM To: onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; Sauvageau, David <david.sauvag...@bell.ca<mailto:david.sauvag...@bell.ca>> Subject: [onap-discuss] [integration][oom] OOM readiness for Beijing release Hi, David, Happy new year and it was very nice to talk with you at Santa Clara. Is OOM ready for Integration team to take over to test the Beijing release, maybe start with Amsterdam project first? From last meeting, it seems have a little bit issue on DCAE, has it resolved yet? Regards, Helen Chen This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amdocs.com_about_email-2Ddisclaimer&d=DwMGaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=_dlaJi5cUYGfdQpkrTvOLmwKf9nHldPQl5dmZYtz2iQ&s=EJl3g98o-LmIGfk4sjynukqHSJ3epLjqaYO4anfC954&e=> _______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=_dlaJi5cUYGfdQpkrTvOLmwKf9nHldPQl5dmZYtz2iQ&s=j7WSvxdz-fKgmH76NuG-x2cW3E_oZL4nU8OuXiW1ylM&e= _______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwQFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=KgFIQiUJzSC0gUhJaQxg8eC3w16GC3sKgWIcs4iIee0&m=R31H22kxjYwICQ8ZD3yEbIihWWgllI9uTVKv-rEmq_M&s=1xdaNYoF-XWCfc_fUVLiqQGdG44FeNm_001LZk7EDBE&e=>
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
