Actually, the MEF is NOT using these guidelines anymore, mainly due to the errors with respect to UML interpretation and the restrictions placed on what UML artifacts can be used in a model.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:50 PM, jessie jewitt < jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com> wrote: > You are correct that it is not an "industry standard" like an IEEE spec. > It is an informal agreement by industry players to use the same UML > Modeling Guidelines. The ONF, ETSI, and MEF use these guidelines, even > though you personally may choose not to do so. > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 1:42 PM, John Strassner <straz...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm sorry, but IISOMI is NOT an "industry standard". It is an "informal >> agreement" that has some consensus among some parts of the industry. >> >> In fact, it contains a number of incorrect conclusions about what UML is >> and is not, and greatly limits the power of using UML constructs. >> >> John >> >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:07 PM, jessie jewitt < >> jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello Hui and Lingli- >>> I've noticed that the modeling guidelines defined here: >>> https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=16003072 >>> >>> do not specify that we should be following the industry defined UML >>> Modeling Guidelines (IISOMI 514) and Papyrus Guidelines (IISOMI 515) >>> defined here: >>> https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=20874416 >>> >>> As a result, there are ONAP IM models being developed that are not in >>> conformance with industry standard guidelines. (For example, some of the >>> Service IM class attributes do not conform to using lower camel case). >>> >>> If these IISOMI Guidelines have not been "accepted" as ONAP Guidelines, >>> I'd like to propose an agenda item to discuss this at the next modeling >>> subcommittee meeting. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Jessie >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> onap-discuss mailing list >>> onap-discuss@lists.onap.org >>> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> regards, >> John >> > > -- regards, John
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
