We did discuss a couple of good use cases in the last use case meeting - the consensus was to go with PCI optimization as the use case to proceed. So, let us keep the SON support for Casablanca. Moreover, we have done some POCs to establish the feasibility of this approach.
Thx Sarat From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2018 3:19 PM To: Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com>; onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc <onap-...@lists.onap.org>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC Thanks, Alla, Small correction: my comment was about slicing optimization, not slicing support in general. We may need to work more on slicing support, but finally it will be done. Vladimir From: Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com<mailto:alla.gold...@amdocs.com>> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2018 9:08 AM To: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) <vyano...@cisco.com<mailto:vyano...@cisco.com>>; onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc <onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC Thanks, Vladimir, 5G task force: the following requests were received: 1. SON support 2. Network slicing support 3. Controllers architecture I attach them to this email. Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image001.png@01D3EB64.887592E0] From: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) [mailto:vyano...@cisco.com] Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2018 6:17 PM To: Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com<mailto:alla.gold...@amdocs.com>>; onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc <onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC Hi, Alla, Thanks for sending this. To my deep regret, there is a problem. Cisco several times expressed opposition to having SON in this release. The reason is that the architecture for SON was never properly analyzed. Therefore I request removal of the following items 1. SON - problem formulation 2. SON - problem solving 3. Slice optimization problem formulation 4. Slice optimization problem solving For all four, the concern is about splitting of the SON procedure(s) into two independent pieces. For #3 and #4, in addition to that, there is no consistent definition yet (in 3GPP) of slice level performance measurements. With no performance measurements, what kind of optimization can be arranged? Thanks Vladimir From: Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com<mailto:alla.gold...@amdocs.com>> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 11:34 AM To: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) <vyano...@cisco.com<mailto:vyano...@cisco.com>>; onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc <onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC Hi Vladimir, The implementation proposals for 5G use cases in Casablanca was also discussed during several Usecase subcommittee meetings and presentation is uploaded for yesterday's TSC meting https://wiki.onap.org/pages/editpage.action?pageId=28381537<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_pages_editpage.action-3FpageId-3D28381537&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=fEZLWz1dGC0hCK3H3CPRqqfvm4_nMAI8OVaDfcQityY&m=JzLe_NhU2iNqPnMsYj_hEDByTeMOuB7rL8aTU4fMm1k&s=FPnQ14HRAnHz1-nCJ1HOTsOM3M_Y2zDB9y7zkNqpGRA&e=> I also attach it. Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image001.png@01D3EB64.887592E0] From: Vladimir Yanover (vyanover) [mailto:vyano...@cisco.com] Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 11:24 AM To: Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com<mailto:alla.gold...@amdocs.com>>; onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc <onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC Alla, Can you please clarify what exactly you received from 5G group? Unless I am missing something, there was no 5G call to finally decide which use cases are going to the use case subcommittee. There were several proposals presented, most of them good, but even for those I have difficulty to understand which of them (and which versions) have been ever endorsed by the 5G group. Thanks Vladimir From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> <onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of Alla Goldner Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 7:58 AM To: onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc <onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-tsc] e2e use cases for approval by the TSC Hi all, As we didn't have any time left for use case discussion and approval during yesterday's TSC meeting and likely will not have till the launch of Beijing due to urgent Beijing related discussions, the meeting decision was that we will host e2e use case approval discussions during Usecase subcommittee meetings on Monday, 4 pm CET. 1. All use case authors - please make sure you distributed your presentations for approval. So far, we've received 5G group, Edge Automation and auto Scaling out 2. Kenny, as agreed, please make sure all PTLs aware the discussion will take place during Use case subcommittee meeting Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image001.png@01D3EB64.887592E0] This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amdocs.com_about_email-2Ddisclaimer&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=fEZLWz1dGC0hCK3H3CPRqqfvm4_nMAI8OVaDfcQityY&m=JzLe_NhU2iNqPnMsYj_hEDByTeMOuB7rL8aTU4fMm1k&s=5EErhteRy8UJp-09z7OLgw_QS70sOg0OHqwFpRc3sdc&e=> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amdocs.com_about_email-2Ddisclaimer&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=fEZLWz1dGC0hCK3H3CPRqqfvm4_nMAI8OVaDfcQityY&m=JzLe_NhU2iNqPnMsYj_hEDByTeMOuB7rL8aTU4fMm1k&s=5EErhteRy8UJp-09z7OLgw_QS70sOg0OHqwFpRc3sdc&e=> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amdocs.com_about_email-2Ddisclaimer&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=fEZLWz1dGC0hCK3H3CPRqqfvm4_nMAI8OVaDfcQityY&m=JzLe_NhU2iNqPnMsYj_hEDByTeMOuB7rL8aTU4fMm1k&s=5EErhteRy8UJp-09z7OLgw_QS70sOg0OHqwFpRc3sdc&e=>
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
