Hi Taka, Thanks for reply.
1. What is the expected request-key here? Is it the name of parameter we are providing? In our case would it be like below? request-keys: - key-name: vnf_name - key-value: vnf_name We tried with this and it's same error. 2. We have tried to change eth source as A&AI and other ruletype it seems that by default the request-keys are fetched as null. 3. How this rule type really works? Is this rule-type represents the AAI object and field key-name represents the actuals field name? 4. How can we specify the new ruletype and new field-key-name? Do we need to add the data in any of the properties file or table? _________________ Thanks & Regards Viresh N From: CHO, TAKAMUNE [mailto:tc0...@att.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 09:50 PM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; Viresh R Navalli <vn00569...@techmahindra.com> Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [appc] APPC CDT- Specifying Source as A&AI in Parameter Definition Viresh, In your PD file, the request-key is missing. -Taka PD file: kind: 'Property Definition' version: V1 vnf-parameter-list: - name: vnf_name type: null description: null required: null default: null source: A&AI rule-type: vnf-name request-keys: null response-keys: - unique-key-name: parent-name unique-key-value: vnf field-key-name: vnf-name Taka From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Viresh R Navalli Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 5:52 AM To: CHO, TAKAMUNE <tc0...@att.com<mailto:tc0...@att.com>> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-discuss] [appc] APPC CDT- Specifying Source as A&AI in Parameter Definition Hi Taka, On further investigation of specifying Source as A&AI in Parameter Definition, we observed below result while running configure action from appc swagger. We tried to use the rule-type as 'vnf-name' and response-keys (unique-key-name: parent-name, unique-key-value: vnf, field-key-name: vnf-name) Please find attached PD file, payload and logs- 2018-10-17 08:20:36,981 | ERROR | ppc-dispatcher-7 | InstarClientNode | 409 - appc-common - 1.3.0 - SvcLogicGraph [module=APPC, rpc=ProcessParameterDefinition, mode=sync, version=4.0.0, md5sum=fc75493451a1d5a7e9b3eece1dfa19eb] - 1 (block) | Failed processing AAI data com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.exc.UnrecognizedPropertyException: Unrecognized field "rule-type" (class org.onap.sdnc.config.params.data.Parameter), not marked as ignorable (9 known properties: "requestKeys", "name", "defaultValue", "responseKeys", "ruleType", "type", "source", "description", "required"]) at [Source: java.io.StringReader@450691af<mailto:java.io.StringReader@450691af>; line: 1, column: 105] (through reference chain: org.onap.sdnc.config.params.data.Parameter["rule-type"]) Queries are- 1. Do we need to upload the key file for parameters with A&AI as source? From wiki it seems that it is only required if the source is other than A&AI. 2. How this rule type really works? Is this rule-type represents the AAI object and field key-name represents the actuals field name? 3. How can we specify the new ruletype and new field-key-name? Do we need to add the data in any of the properties file or table? 4. Can someone validate if the attached PD file in the right format or any missing attributes? _________________ Thanks & Regards Viresh N From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Chandra Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 07:55 PM To: CHO, TAKAMUNE <tc0...@att.com<mailto:tc0...@att.com>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [appc] APPC CDT- Specifying Source as A&AI in Parameter Definition Thanks Taka for your response. We will investigate the error again and if needed we will post it in community. From: CHO, TAKAMUNE [mailto:tc0...@att.com] Sent: 12 October 2018 19:49 To: Chandrashekhar Thakare <ct00548...@techmahindra.com<mailto:ct00548...@techmahindra.com>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: RE: [appc] APPC CDT- Specifying Source as A&AI in Parameter Definition Yes. Those Configure actions are nothing changing in Casablanca. Thus should be in Beijing. Taka From: Chandrashekhar Thakare [mailto:ct00548...@techmahindra.com] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 10:16 AM To: CHO, TAKAMUNE <tc0...@att.com<mailto:tc0...@att.com>>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: RE: [appc] APPC CDT- Specifying Source as A&AI in Parameter Definition Hi Taka, Do you mean that source as A&AI is supported in Beijing? From: CHO, TAKAMUNE [mailto:tc0...@att.com] Sent: 12 October 2018 19:42 To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>; Chandrashekhar Thakare <ct00548...@techmahindra.com<mailto:ct00548...@techmahindra.com>> Subject: RE: [appc] APPC CDT- Specifying Source as A&AI in Parameter Definition Hi Please see my answer below. Taka From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Chandra Sent: Friday, October 12, 2018 6:55 AM To: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-discuss] [appc] APPC CDT- Specifying Source as A&AI in Parameter Definition Hi, We are trying to upload the parameter definitions from CDT and trying to specify the source as A&AI. If we specify the source as A&AI; the values should be fetched from A&AI while preparing the config templates and APPC does not expect these values in the Configure/ConfigScaleout request. However we are getting errors while executing the configure request. I was checking demo Videos of CDT and it seems that specifying source as A&AI ,not available in Beijing and APPC always expects these values from SO. Queries are- 1. Can you please confirm if source as A&AI is not supported for Configure, ConfigScaleout, ModifyConfig? Or specifically it is not supported only for ConfigScaleout? [Taka] Source as A&AI is supported for all Configure related actions 2. Could you please confirm if this functionality included in Casablanca release? [Taka] Yes Regards Chandrashekhar ============================================================================================================================ Disclaimer: This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may review the policy at http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.techmahindra.com_Disclaimer.html&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2SpRaOlaUglzr4dgoYaSsJQHU3X5g6PDPy8-4kdLndM&m=-CdBI-vpdx07W7pwvm_wE4dXY5cERPVfc0kUc3DJM5Q&s=9yRRwSWqGI24M9VrzcwmHFApHDFTcbTOzJHziuiRiz4&e=> externally http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__tim.techmahindra.com_tim_disclaimer.html&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=2SpRaOlaUglzr4dgoYaSsJQHU3X5g6PDPy8-4kdLndM&m=-CdBI-vpdx07W7pwvm_wE4dXY5cERPVfc0kUc3DJM5Q&s=-c6DtM23ABCVeL_byUHZqjSwECvkR2bBqU7nO7cEeD4&e=> internally within TechMahindra. ============================================================================================================================ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#13143): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13143 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27268933/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
