I'm open to either approach.  I am a little concerned about adding to the 
S3P list, as it has been a challenge to meet even the existing 
requirements.  However, if there is already full support, and the work to 
the project teams is minimal, then I think it could work.



Regards,
Jason Hunt 
Distinguished Engineer, IBM 

Phone: 314-749-7422
Email: djh...@us.ibm.com
Twitter: @DJHunt
 



From:   Gildas Lanilis <gildas.lani...@huawei.com>
To:     Adolfo Perez-Duran <adolfo.perez-du...@oamtechnologies.com>, 
"alla.gold...@amdocs.com" <alla.gold...@amdocs.com>, Jason Hunt 
<djh...@us.ibm.com>, "onap-discuss@lists.onap.org" 
<onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>
Cc:     Tina Tsou <tina.t...@arm.com>, Brian Hedstrom 
<brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com>, Bob Monkman <bob.monk...@arm.com>, 
Yunxia Chen <helen.c...@huawei.com>
Date:   10/23/2018 05:29 PM
Subject:        RE: Non-functional requirement proposal for Dublin: 
Adopting ONAP Normative Base Images



Hi,
 
I see 2 approaches:
1)      Make it part of one of the S3P dimension
2)      Or include it in the Non-functional requirement list (example: as 
we did in Casablanca at 
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Casablanca+Release+Requirements#CasablancaReleaseRequirements-NonFunctionalRequirements
 
)
 
Thanks,
Gildas
ONAP Release Manager
1 415 238 6287
 
From: Adolfo Perez-Duran [mailto:adolfo.perez-du...@oamtechnologies.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2018 11:39 AM
To: alla.gold...@amdocs.com; Gildas Lanilis <gildas.lani...@huawei.com>; 
Jason Hunt <djh...@us.ibm.com>; onap-discuss@lists.onap.org
Cc: Tina Tsou <tina.t...@arm.com>; Brian Hedstrom 
<brian.hedst...@oamtechnologies.com>; Bob Monkman <bob.monk...@arm.com>; 
Yunxia Chen <helen.c...@huawei.com>
Subject: Non-functional requirement proposal for Dublin: Adopting ONAP 
Normative Base Images
 
Alla, Gildas, Jason
 
Could you advise on the process we should follow to introduce this 
non-functional requirement to the Dublin release?
 
Requirement: Use ONAP Normative Base Images to Improve deployability and 
reduce footprint and resource consumption
 
Rationale:
Both operators looking to experiment with ONAP and developers producing 
ONAP containers report long build times and high resource consumption. The 
OOM team also reports long deployment times and high resource consumption.
 
Furthermore, small, efficient images also address the issue some operators 
have reported when they have attempted to deploy ONAP to "kick the tires." 

 
Proposed solution and benefits:
ONAP's CIA project has identified a set of container base images that, if 
adopted,  would alleviate the problems of resource consumption and long 
build times ONAP projects are experiencing.
 
Experiments conducted with the proposed base images have produced 
container images that were up to two orders of magnitude smaller. Smaller 
images translate into smaller build and deploy times as well as smaller 
footprint.
 
Community support:
The idea of using these normative base images was presented to the PTL 
community on October 8th, 2018. There is consensus and  support for the 
adoption of these base images and for the introduction of a non-functional 
requirement for Dublin.
 
It was suggested that also cover the requirement under S3P, Jason Hunt has 
been made aware of the requirement.
 
Timeline:
We propose that the requirement be met by M3.
 
Thanks,
 
Adolfo 




-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#13246): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/13246
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27571472/21656
Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub  
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to