Hi Jessie, Maybe I misunderstood your previous comment, I’m ok if we can align with the current GenDoc output format.
@Hui, it seems no more comments are received, can we conclude that the proposal is agreed by the subcommittee? BR, Xu From: jessie jewitt [mailto:jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2018 1:51 AM To: yangxu (H) <yang...@huawei.com> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; denghui (L) <denghu...@huawei.com>; onap-...@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for agreement on lifecycle stereotype Hi Xu- That's the reason I made the comment. The wiki should be aligned with how GenDoc outputs the applied stereotypes, and the way I described is how GenDoc does it. -Jessie On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 6:43 PM, yangxu (H) <yang...@huawei.com<mailto:yang...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hi Jessie, The comment is valid, but would you prefer to mark the lifecycle of the model on the wiki in a different way, i.e., using Experimental, Faulty, etc. directly? I think it would be better to align with the GenDoc outputs now, though they may not be proper. Because it’s very likely that we will use Gendoc to update the wiki in the future, having the format aligned will ease the work. BR, Xu From: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>] On Behalf Of Jessie Jewitt Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 3:21 AM To: onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org>>; denghui (L) <denghu...@huawei.com<mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> Cc: onap-...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-...@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for agreement on lifecycle stereotype Just a minor comment: The lifecycle states ARE the applied stereotypes, not something called "lifecycle: XYZ". That's how GenDoc outputs them today. So, as an example, the applied stereotype for an artifact would be "Experimental". Otherwise, it looks like your applied stereotype is "lifecycle". Also, I have an action item to determine the triggers for the various state transitions, but that shouldn't block approval of this proposal. On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 1:07 AM, denghui (L) <denghu...@huawei.com<mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hello, modelers, This is a call for agreement on using the lifecycle stereotype according to the last call. Information of the proposal can be found at https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Lifecycle+Stereotype+Proposal. Agreements need to be reached across the modeling subcommittee are: • Agree on using lifecycle stereotype and following the definitions/state machine for the resource IM • Agree on adopting the same approach for other modeling areas Deadline for this call is July 11th, PST 00:00. Please comment on the mailing list if you have any concerns. Best regards, DENG Hui -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11014): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/message/11014 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23196970/21656 Group Owner: onap-discuss+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-discuss/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
