Hi Sven, We look forward to working with Ericsson and other companies on the Policy Framework.
There is a place for your policy infrastructure. We have long envisioned the Policy Framework to be extendable to support multiple PDP Engines, languages, and extensions such as conflict mitigation. Please feel free to add your team as contributors to start, I believe the “who should be” a committer status is something that will be worked out as the project gets assessed/approved by the TSC. Thanks, Pam Pamela Dragosh Lead Inventive Scientist ONAP Policy AT&T Research pdrag...@research.att.com From: <onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> on behalf of Sven van der Meer <sven.van.der.m...@ericsson.com> Date: Monday, May 15, 2017 at 5:40 AM To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal Dear Pam! We would like to strongly support your proposal for a policy framework and actively contribute to it. Our main work over the past years is in Adaptive Policies and we are prepared to contribute our APEX policy infrastructure to ONAP, plus underling work on policy languages (a DSL approach), conflict mitigation and context, policy continuum (translation/transformation/refinement between arbitrary domains), and the seamless execution of different policy models. At the moment we are looking into providing our policy instrumentation as either a set of engines in the PDP package or as a system covering some aspects of PDP, PEP, and PAP – providing a complimentary alternative to any existing policy code in the packages. Does that make sense? Furthermore, we would like to contribute to the overall ONAP discussion on policy frameworks as a precursor for specifications and later code. We have a few publications in the area, which might help to understand our background. For instance, the group “APEX: Adaptive Policy” (the telecom policy group there, not the bio/agricultural groups ☺) on ResearchGate.net contains a number of papers on control loops (5G Summit) and engine (APEX for autonomic anomaly detection using Ericsson’s COMPA control loop, running last year in North America): - https://www.researchgate.net/project/Apex-Adaptive-Policy There is more work in other areas I can point you to if you are interested, for instance the IETF SUPA information model and 5G management requirements from European projects. My main question then is: how do we best engage with your team and the proposal? And is there a place for our policy infrastructure? Thanks /sven [ricsson]<http://www.ericsson.com/> SVEN VAN DER MEER Dr.-Ing. Master Engineer NM Lab Ericsson Ericsson Software Campus, Athlone, Co. Westmeath N37 PV44, Ireland Phone +353 90 6462011 Mobile +353 87 1953797 sven.van.der.m...@erisccon.com www.ericsson.com [ttp://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign]<http://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign> Legal entity: LMI, registered office in Dublin. This Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer<http://www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer> From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of DRAGOSH, PAMELA L (PAM) Sent: 11 May 2017 13:58 To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-tsc] Policy Framework Project Proposal Hello Committee Members, I would like to submit the following project proposal: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Policy+Framework+Project+Proposal Regards, Pam Pamela Dragosh Lead Inventive Scientist ONAP Policy AT&T Research pdrag...@research.att.com<mailto:pdrag...@research.att.com>
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc