Hi Dewayne ,Maopeng
If both options could be pursued in parallel，I think we should change the proposal like following: It is envisioned that initial Releases of this project would demonstrate both alternative approaches. For Alternative 1 approach: · Demonstrate SO BPMN workflows interacting with an off-the-shelf TOSCA Orchestrator to collectively drive orchestration behavior for at least an instantiation use case · Demonstrate rainy day handling · Accomplish the above in a way that is demonstrably extensible to support lifecycle operations such as Scale-In and Scale-Out. For Alternative 2 approach: · Demonstrate SO BPMN workflows to drive TOSCA-aware orchestration behavior for VoLTE use case, dependency to VF-C. · Support lifecycle operations such as Scale-In and Scale-Out. What’s your opinion. Best wishes Jinxin *************************************************************************************** 本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！************************************************************************************** *************************************************************************************** This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! *************************************************************************************** From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn Sent: 2017年5月17日 9:11 To: dewa...@gigaspaces.com Cc: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-tsc] 答复: Re: 答复: Service Orchestrator project proposal Hi DeWayne, Do you mean that this project proposal should support option 1 and option 2( integrated with VF-C)? If it is ture, the project proposal should be changed. Best Regards Maopeng 原始邮件 发件人： ＜dewa...@gigaspaces.com＞; 收件人：张茂鹏10030173; 抄送人： ＜onap-tsc@lists.onap.org＞; 日 期 ：2017年05月16日 23:11 主 题 ：Re: 答复: [onap-tsc] Service Orchestrator project proposal Maopeng, The rationale behind option 1 vs option 2 was based on participant input at the time. As far as I know, the time has passed for new project proposals. I suppose it is conceivable with enough committers that both options could be pursued in parallel. The proposal is submitted however. Perhaps the TSC can chime in. DeWayne On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 1:02 AM, ＜zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn<mailto:zhang.maope...@zte.com.cn>＞ wrote: Hi DeWayne, I am interested in and already committed to contributing to this project. I am afraid that I am confused since there are two alternatives on the proposal page, but it said in release 1 the project will only demonstrate option 1( Only depend on App-C project) Since we are interested in contributing option 2, I doubt it is still open for discussion? Or shall we document it in a separate project proposal instead? Best Regards Maopeng 原始邮件 发件人： ＜dewa...@gigaspaces.com<mailto:dewa...@gigaspaces.com>＞; 收件人： ＜onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>＞; 日 期 ：2017年05月15日 01:32 主 题 ：[onap-tsc] Service Orchestrator project proposal ONAP TSC, We would like to formally propose the SO (Service Orchestrator) project for ONAP.. The proposal wiki page, which includes details of the project description, project scopes, and proposed repo names, can be found at: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Service+Orchestrator. The SO team consists of representatives from Cloudify, AT&T, Huawei, China Mobile, Ericsson, Orange, Amdocs, Nokia, and ZTE. Thanks, DeWayne Filppi Director Solution Architecture Gigaspaces/Cloudify dewa...@gigaspaces.com<mailto:dewa...@gigaspaces.com> 714.512.1706<tel:(714)%20512-1706> -- DeWayne Filppi, Director, Solutions Architect [https://storage.googleapis.com/signaturesatori/customer-C00h6qxzk/images/-27020792c3e94269b883d9a828be029f56c08986b2ab208a46143b169592c35a.png]<http://cloudify.co> ________________________________ M: +17145121706 http://cloudify.co<http://cloudify..co/> @dfilppi [https://storage.googleapis.com/signaturesatori/customer-C00h6qxzk/images/2fb5e7413e7dbeee3e88676333b65c05237ec13d3512e4a63ebc1b5f85bfb917.png]<https://twitter.com/CloudifySource> [https://storage.googleapis.com/signaturesatori/customer-C00h6qxzk/images/16b91ab7a91bb3a298f2a322640bebb3754357f93e9f20ff50d2c94bb82b1814.png] <https://www.linkedin.com/company-beta/17918192/> [https://storage.googleapis.com/signaturesatori/customer-C00h6qxzk/images/6f7421bc5b9a93a0649735bbc8589b200c678bf08af9d7e0cebf1b3cffcdac94.png] <https://github.com/cloudify-cosmo> [https://storage.googleapis.com/signaturesatori/customer-C00h6qxzk/images/4be4d1377f4c1afe70a25e78926b6aad4e0a4fb1d45a7727e31d5a807eb3aae7.png] <https://www.youtube.com/cloudifysource>
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
