Dear all,
Thanks for attending yesterday's meeting.
Here is meeting's summary:
1. I will approach separately all relevant PTLs (see more detailed
summary below) urging them to attend corresponding use cases meetings
2. Going forward, we move to weekly meetings, following doodle poll
results. Next week we will also require slot during virtual meeting
3. R1 use cases: vCPE and vVoLTE use cases were presented by Kang Xi/Jon
Fannar and Yang Xe/Chengli Wang correspondingly. Both use cases leaders report
good progress and good chances of completing all definitions and close on
required functionality with all projects this week. The following points still
pending discussions though:
a. vCPE
i. Today
meeting will be held with SO/SDC/SDN-C teams. Gil Bullard will present an
updated version of the vCPE service model in this meeting. PTLs - please
attend, this is critical for correct projects' interpretation of what is
required to do
ii.
DCAE/Intel discussion to close packets' format has already started, will be
completed this week
iii. Brian
Freeman started experimenting with onboarding a vCPE VNF with generic Unix
machine heat templates
b. vVoLTE
i. Meetings
with CLAMP/DCAE/HOLMES teams were held. There is pending issue on direct
connection of HOLMES (not via DCAE) and this need to be handled by Architecture
subcommittee ASAP. I will issue separate email on this
ii. Meetings
with SDC/SDN-C team will be held this week. PTLs - please attend, this is
critical for correct projects' interpretation of what is required to do
iii. Gil
Bullard wil be requested to help with defining a model which drives the use case
iv. A question
on whether vIMS+vEPC is enforced as a single request coming from SO (i.e. as a
single network service or not). It was clarified that it is up to
implementation, as VF-C can support it both ways. It will also be checked with
SO team, and the corresponding clarification will be included in the use case
description
v. For
overlay - whether Openstack or hardware will be used - discussions with Brian
Freeman were initiated, once agreed, an update on results will be provided
4. Helen (Integration Project PTL) requested to review all use cases till
the end of this month, to make sure that all functionality is well understood
and closed before functionality freeze (beginning of August). We will have
meeting during next week's virtual meeting and also the following week to
review and close on this. Integration team members will join this meeting.
5. R2 use cases:
a. MEC (mobile edge computing, based on ETSI MEC specifications) will be
added as one of potential 5G use cases
b. Timeframe for Use case subcommittee's R2 use cases consolidated
proposal to the TSC - September's f2f meeting
c. Long (China Telecom) presented revised version of Enterprise vCPE use
case. It was asked to move it under R2 use cases definitions
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Release+2+Use+Cases
d. Network Function Change Management will also be revised by AT&T as use
case and included in R2 use cases proposal
e. It was clarified that, based on proposals, we will see if/how to merge
different proposals and which exact functionality we target for R2
f. All - you are more than welcomed to submit your proposals and
initiate email discussions. We will then take discussions during our meetings,
as time permits (first priority - R1 use cases required discussions and actions)
Best regards,
Alla Goldner
Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology
[cid:image001.png@01D2FFBC.B558DCC0]
From: Alla Goldner
Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 5:22 PM
To: 'onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org' <onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org>
Cc: onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>
Subject: Use case subcommittee - agenda for tomorrow's (17/07/2017) meeting
Hi all,
Here is agenda for tomorrow's Use case subcommittee meeting. R1 use cases are
of highest priority. We must see if/what is needed to complete use cases
interactions with a different projects this week.
We will start going over R2 use case only if time permits.
PTLs of a different projects, please indicate before tomorrow's meeting if
additional clarifications on R1 use cases are needed.
Please upload your suggested R2 use cases
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Release+2+Use+Cases, so we can start some
offline discussions as well.
1. R1 use cases (vCPE and vVoLTE): Status, Open issues, required actions
(use cases leaders: vCPE: Kang Xi/Yoav Kluger/Jon Fannar, vVoLTE: Yang
Xe/Chengli Wang/Lingli Deng)
2. R2 use cases: the initial proposals (list of those mentioned by a
different related email exchanges is here):
* Network Function Change Management
* Enterprise vCPE
* SD-WAN
* SD-LAN
* 5G
i. RAN
deployment
ii. E2E
Network Slicing
1. AOB
For your information:
1. No comments were received for Use case subcommittee flow of operation
as documented here
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Usecase+subcommittee<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Usecase-2Bsubcommittee&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=YQZaNPLN15xk3BWcVl7k8w&m=fJeFF2gsoUxIvMSd7LwlFJm195aQf6PCsGoLcOOJcVs&s=_gs9OYnZ5I93MA1QgqXnFJ9luEVCYalLple1Iynub1w&e=>
2. Meetings were held discussing use cases implementation with a
different projects. We will go over status of those meetings. List of points
from the last week is as following:
a. vCPE:
i. Still
under discussion?:
1. DCAE/Intel discussion to close packets' format (please involve Alok
Gupta per his request)
2. Interactions with SDC will be further clarified AG> Status.
3. SDN-C functional extension will be discussed with SDN-C team
ii. Meeting
with SDN-C/SDC/SO covering vCPE service model by Gil Bullard is scheduled for
this Tuesday (relates to points 2 and 3 from the list above)
iii. Brian
Freeman started experimenting with onboarding a vCPE VNF with generic unix
machine heat templates
b. vVoLTE
i. There is
request to include model which drives the use case in the vVolTE use case
description
ii. A
question on whether vIMS+vEPC is enforced as a single request coming from SO
(i.e. as a single network service or not). It was clarified that it is up to
implementation, as VF-C can support it both ways. The corresponding
clarification should be included in the use case description
iii. Still
under discussion?:
1. SDC for design time functionality
2. SDN-C interaction with 3rd party controller
3. For overlay - whether Openstack or hardware will be used - discussions
with Brian Freeman are initiated
3. Following doodle poll results, I sent dedicated mail yesterday. We are
moving to weekly meetings.
Best regards,
Alla Goldner
Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology
[cid:image001.png@01D2FFBC.B558DCC0]
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
<https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
