Dear all, Thanks for attending yesterday's meeting.
Here is meeting's summary: 1. I will approach separately all relevant PTLs (see more detailed summary below) urging them to attend corresponding use cases meetings 2. Going forward, we move to weekly meetings, following doodle poll results. Next week we will also require slot during virtual meeting 3. R1 use cases: vCPE and vVoLTE use cases were presented by Kang Xi/Jon Fannar and Yang Xe/Chengli Wang correspondingly. Both use cases leaders report good progress and good chances of completing all definitions and close on required functionality with all projects this week. The following points still pending discussions though: a. vCPE i. Today meeting will be held with SO/SDC/SDN-C teams. Gil Bullard will present an updated version of the vCPE service model in this meeting. PTLs - please attend, this is critical for correct projects' interpretation of what is required to do ii. DCAE/Intel discussion to close packets' format has already started, will be completed this week iii. Brian Freeman started experimenting with onboarding a vCPE VNF with generic Unix machine heat templates b. vVoLTE i. Meetings with CLAMP/DCAE/HOLMES teams were held. There is pending issue on direct connection of HOLMES (not via DCAE) and this need to be handled by Architecture subcommittee ASAP. I will issue separate email on this ii. Meetings with SDC/SDN-C team will be held this week. PTLs - please attend, this is critical for correct projects' interpretation of what is required to do iii. Gil Bullard wil be requested to help with defining a model which drives the use case iv. A question on whether vIMS+vEPC is enforced as a single request coming from SO (i.e. as a single network service or not). It was clarified that it is up to implementation, as VF-C can support it both ways. It will also be checked with SO team, and the corresponding clarification will be included in the use case description v. For overlay - whether Openstack or hardware will be used - discussions with Brian Freeman were initiated, once agreed, an update on results will be provided 4. Helen (Integration Project PTL) requested to review all use cases till the end of this month, to make sure that all functionality is well understood and closed before functionality freeze (beginning of August). We will have meeting during next week's virtual meeting and also the following week to review and close on this. Integration team members will join this meeting. 5. R2 use cases: a. MEC (mobile edge computing, based on ETSI MEC specifications) will be added as one of potential 5G use cases b. Timeframe for Use case subcommittee's R2 use cases consolidated proposal to the TSC - September's f2f meeting c. Long (China Telecom) presented revised version of Enterprise vCPE use case. It was asked to move it under R2 use cases definitions https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Release+2+Use+Cases d. Network Function Change Management will also be revised by AT&T as use case and included in R2 use cases proposal e. It was clarified that, based on proposals, we will see if/how to merge different proposals and which exact functionality we target for R2 f. All - you are more than welcomed to submit your proposals and initiate email discussions. We will then take discussions during our meetings, as time permits (first priority - R1 use cases required discussions and actions) Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image001.png@01D2FFBC.B558DCC0] From: Alla Goldner Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 5:22 PM To: 'onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org' <onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org> Cc: onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> Subject: Use case subcommittee - agenda for tomorrow's (17/07/2017) meeting Hi all, Here is agenda for tomorrow's Use case subcommittee meeting. R1 use cases are of highest priority. We must see if/what is needed to complete use cases interactions with a different projects this week. We will start going over R2 use case only if time permits. PTLs of a different projects, please indicate before tomorrow's meeting if additional clarifications on R1 use cases are needed. Please upload your suggested R2 use cases https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Release+2+Use+Cases, so we can start some offline discussions as well. 1. R1 use cases (vCPE and vVoLTE): Status, Open issues, required actions (use cases leaders: vCPE: Kang Xi/Yoav Kluger/Jon Fannar, vVoLTE: Yang Xe/Chengli Wang/Lingli Deng) 2. R2 use cases: the initial proposals (list of those mentioned by a different related email exchanges is here): * Network Function Change Management * Enterprise vCPE * SD-WAN * SD-LAN * 5G i. RAN deployment ii. E2E Network Slicing 1. AOB For your information: 1. No comments were received for Use case subcommittee flow of operation as documented here https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Usecase+subcommittee<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Usecase-2Bsubcommittee&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=YQZaNPLN15xk3BWcVl7k8w&m=fJeFF2gsoUxIvMSd7LwlFJm195aQf6PCsGoLcOOJcVs&s=_gs9OYnZ5I93MA1QgqXnFJ9luEVCYalLple1Iynub1w&e=> 2. Meetings were held discussing use cases implementation with a different projects. We will go over status of those meetings. List of points from the last week is as following: a. vCPE: i. Still under discussion?: 1. DCAE/Intel discussion to close packets' format (please involve Alok Gupta per his request) 2. Interactions with SDC will be further clarified AG> Status. 3. SDN-C functional extension will be discussed with SDN-C team ii. Meeting with SDN-C/SDC/SO covering vCPE service model by Gil Bullard is scheduled for this Tuesday (relates to points 2 and 3 from the list above) iii. Brian Freeman started experimenting with onboarding a vCPE VNF with generic unix machine heat templates b. vVoLTE i. There is request to include model which drives the use case in the vVolTE use case description ii. A question on whether vIMS+vEPC is enforced as a single request coming from SO (i.e. as a single network service or not). It was clarified that it is up to implementation, as VF-C can support it both ways. The corresponding clarification should be included in the use case description iii. Still under discussion?: 1. SDC for design time functionality 2. SDN-C interaction with 3rd party controller 3. For overlay - whether Openstack or hardware will be used - discussions with Brian Freeman are initiated 3. Following doodle poll results, I sent dedicated mail yesterday. We are moving to weekly meetings. Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image001.png@01D2FFBC.B558DCC0] This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer <https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc