Hi Alla: Thanks for sharing your views. This is a good discussion to be had – Focus on base ONAP capabilities or put some emphasis on new use cases. My opinion is the following:
1) I see these two things as somewhat linked and not disjointed from each other. As we look at missing ONAP platform capabilities, it is helpful to look at them in the context of certain use cases. The use cases also help with continuous integration and validation of platform capabilities. We need to strike a balance for R2 – A) Not a laundry list of use cases, yet a couple of interesting use cases that allow us to drive mindshare for ONAP e.g. 5G Network Slicing and SDWAN and 2) It is important to address the capabilities gap in ONAP and ensure we continue to make it stable and a complete service orchestration platform. 2) I would also emphasize what we agreed during the June F2F – The use cases are not intended to be fully featured, fully tested, commercially deployable solutions. The use cases are meant as a development vehicle for validating key capabilities of ONAP and to facilitate continuous integration and validation. 3) We are quickly headed to the 5G transition which presents a host of interesting services and business opportunities for the service provider ecosystem. IMO, we need to look at a few base capabilities in support of 5G. Network Slicing would be an interesting use case to start with. We will need to define the scope carefully to ensure that it does not become a kitchen sink. I thought Vimal Begwani made a great start at defining this use case that some of us are contributing to. 4) The SDWAN is a natural adjacency to vCPE use case in ONAP R1. This should not add a lot of complexity. My summary is therefore to focus on: 1) a couple of prioritized use cases for R2 (5G Network Slicing and SDWAN) and 2) Drive continued emphasis on making ONAP architecture and base capabilities robust. Regards, Rajesh From: <onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> on behalf of Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com> Date: Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 11:47 AM To: "onap-tsc@lists.onap.org" <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-tsc] R2 use cases planning Hi again, And in order to start the actual discussion… ☺ My own view is: 1. We should concentrate on missing ONAP Platform capabilities 2. New functional use cases can only be considered if a. They have big level of similarity/harmonization with R1 use case b. They are about extending ONAP Platform capabilities (no introduction of new functionality, new PNFs/VNFs, etc.) 3. We should follow the high level milestones plan presented on the last slide Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image001.png@01D31754.5538BDB0] From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Alla Goldner Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2017 9:39 PM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-tsc] R2 use cases planning Hi, TSC, I forward the material I’ve presented today on Usecase subcommittee discussions and ask for your feedback. We need to get guidelines on what to concentrate on for R2. Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image001.png@01D31754.5538BDB0] From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Alla Goldner Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2017 8:21 PM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>; 'onap-disc...@lists.onap.org' <onap-disc...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>> Cc: onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-discuss] R2 use cases planning Hi all, Unfortunately, we didn’t have time during the TSC meeting to cover R2 use cases topic. I would like to ask you to review the attached presentation, covering status of Usecase subcommittee discussions and asking TSC for guidelines on directions we should take going forward (Extending ONAP Platform capabilities or introducing new functional use cases). Also, some initial proposal for R2 timelines is part of this input material, with emphasize given to pre-R2 milestones related to use cases approval. It is part of the next meeting agenda, https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2017-08-17+Meeting+Agenda . It would be great if we can start the related discussion by emails and get your feedback prior to TSC meeting next week. Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image001.png@01D31754.5538BDB0] This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
