Dear ONAP TSC Members, We had several discussion sessions regarding “Heat template vs OOM” with PTLs, a lot of emails follow ups in past 4+ weeks, and we also tested OOM and Heat template in Integration lab in past two weeks. Here are our conclusions:
1. Heat template deployment is more mature than OOM with Kubernetes at this moment 2. Most of the OpenECOMP projects have done integration test with Heat template while Kubernetes based has not done any 3. PTLs / key developers feel less comfortable to “learn” a new tool at this time Based on above reasons, Integration team recommends to use Heat template as ONAP platform deployment strategy in Amsterdam Release. Please send your email vote for “whether you approve using Heat template as ONAP platform deployment strategy in Amsterdam Release”, options are: +1: approve 0: no opinion -1: disapprove Due: 9/20/2017, 6:00PM PDT. Kenny, please help us collect the result. The result will impact our integration testing priority and integration lab resource allocation priority. Regards, Helen Chen
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
