Hi all,

For your information, please see below feedback on priorities of use 
cases/requirements received from Service Providers so far.
We will discuss these and additional requirements from Service Providers, 
attending the call.

Requirements from Verizon, in the order of priority: (architecture/modelling 
subcommittees and affected projects - please pay attention to relevant 
requirements in the list)


  *   Standards compliant on-boarding / orchestration interfaces

     *   SOL001 for Onboarding ( preferred )
     *   SOL003 for Or-Vnfm ( preferred )
     *   VNF Package certification & labelling
  *   Declarative model based orchestration
     *   TOSCA based orchestration of network services, along with 
Yang/Netconf/VES for automated configuration ( preferred )
     *   Model driven workflow orchestration for LCM
     *   Custom workflows via Apache Aria plugins ( preferred ) for Closed Loop 
& SA.
  *   Fine grained RBAC for deployment dashboard
     *   Ability to derive custom SDC & VID roles with fine grained attributes

        *   Eg : Designer A cannot design services tagged to Designer B etc.
  *   Ability to deploy Geo-Redundant Highly available Network services
     *   GR part of network design requirement in SDC.
     *   Ability to orchestrate network services between multi-site / 
multi-region VIMs
  *   Geo-Redundant Highly available ONAP deployment
     *   Shared runtime catalogues across multi ONAP instances
        *   Eg : ONAP B should be able to deploy NS designed by ONAP A etc.

And the corresponding questions:

  *   How many of the above requirements can be made available by readily 
tweaking existing code, with minimum efforts?
  *   How many would / can be scoped for future releases? if so, tentative 
timeline if any?
  *   Where & how can we help contributing to ONAP w.r.t above requirements?
Requirements and input on proposed use cases from Bell: (architecture/modelling 
subcommittees and affected projects - please pay attention to relevant 
requirements in the list)


  *   ONAP needs a more robust/generic implementation of functionality 
leveraged by existing use cases:
For example, there is still hard-coded logic just to make simple use cases work 
(such as Firewall closed loop)
-          A provider-specific closed-loop implementation is not possible at 
this time, as the hard-coded use case logic should be implemented generically.
-          We are going through that with a real use case - it can't be 
leveraged right now without significant code changes to APPC, SDNC, Policy and 
DCAE.

  *   Basic ONAP features which should be working reliably can be either 
incomplete, have been hardcoded or are still broken
Examples of such features:
-          SDC support for distribution of models/artifacts to multiple ONAP 
environments (development, testing, QA, production, etc.)
-          MultiVIM/Cloud's role is to abstract the VIM, currently SO does not 
leverage it, and no abstraction is built into it (it exposes directly the 
OpenStack model).
-          APPC's handling of events / actions from Policy is pretty much 
hardcoded for the use cases.
-          AAF is not or very lightly leveraged within the platform
There are much more - but in overall ONAP would benefit from improving existing 
features before building new, but partially working features.

  *   VNF Configuration support is quite important for pretty much every use 
cases - and isn't well supported right now (aside initial/boot up 
configuration).
-          It is often the next operational need, right after any lifecycle 
management implementation
-          A model-driven approach to this leveraging standards-based / 
abstract configuration models, and the framework to derive device-specific 
configuration, as well as interpret (read) them is required.
-          With configuration comes the need for supporting resource 
assignment, resource availability, etc.

With regards to the specific use-cases for Casablanca, in order of interest for 
us:
1. Centralized Representation and Consistent Identification of Cloud Regions In 
ONAP

  *   This could quickly become a potential issue with ONAP, as providers start 
to use it or scale beyond a single cloud region implementation.

2. Change Management Extensions

  *   An important feature as soon as VNFs gets deployed in a production 
environment.
  *   Not natively supported in ONAP - any upgrade of VNF software is 100% a 
custom implementation.
  *   It is related to general VNF Configuration management - which is an 
overall ONAP need.

3. Edge Automation through ONAP

  *   Slightly related to item 1 - required when scaling / distributing ONAP 
components.
  *   Potential heavy involvement of OOM in this one in order to deploy 
distributed ONAP components at the Edge.

4. OpenSource Access Manager

  *   Interesting use case, but also a very large / ambitious initiative.
  *   In order to be implemented, it depends on several ONAP components and 
their features to work reliably.
  *   For service providers, this is a major undertaking - so slightly less of 
a short-term, immediate need.

5. 5G Use case Items

  *   PNF support primarily from our point of view, although ONAP partially 
supports this - it should definitely be improved.
  *   5G is less of an immediate need than the other use cases, given ONAP 
could benefit from several improvements to existing functionality.

Additional input from Bell:

We should focus on completing the existing feature set rather than starting 
something new like 5g - making the features work for real so that more 
operators can actually start using the platform. Then 5g or other are just use 
cases.

We should put a very little percentage in adding use cases, especially if we 
are hard coding policies and other parameters just so that he use case is 
working at the end of a release. Fix vFW, fix vCPE, fix VoLTE, do not add. The 
ultimate goal is to have a platform on which any use case can be deployed.


Best regards,

Alla Goldner

Open Network Division
Amdocs Technology


[cid:image001.png@01D3E06B.3B567280]

This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,

you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer 
<https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>
_______________________________________________
ONAP-TSC mailing list
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc

Reply via email to