Hello Jessie Answer inline == >
From: jessie jewitt [mailto:jessie.jew...@oamtechnologies.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 4, 2018 3:46 AM To: denghui (L) <denghu...@huawei.com> Cc: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] ONAP R3 Modeling high level requirements Hello DENG Hui, I think it has been beneficial to collect and review the modeling requirements for R3. Thank you for doing this. I have a few questions for you, if you would be so kind as to answer: 1. The requirements were supposed to be completed, according to the Casablanca Release Calendar, on 5/25. I haven't seen a poll, or anything, for the approval of these requirements. When do you anticipate they will be officially approved? I didn't see anything in the meeting minutes from today's meeting. ==> yesterday it was on the agenda, but due to other topics, we can’t have this part of discussion. In this case, we have to have discussion next Tuesday and start to poll right after if necessarily. I read through the comments on the wiki page, there is only 1 pending comment from your question about the consensus of service interest group, I am curious why don't you discuss them in that interest group, but challenge it in the modeling subcommittee, this way really slow down our progress 2. Again, according to the release calendar, we were to have established a "modeling plan" by 6/28. Does such a plan exist? If so, could you point me to where I can find it? ==> modeling plan is quite align with high level requirement, it will automate reflect the plan, we could use same contents for plan. 3. You indicated in the modeling subcommittee meeting this morning that our "model freeze" is in 3 weeks. With the requirements not yet agreed, and given the number of requirements currently specified, what is your expectation of what can actually be accomplished in 3 week's time? == > My suggestion is to postpone to M3 other than M2 for modeling freeze, I will bring this up to committee for discussion. == > This is our 1st trial of procedure , we will revise it after this release accordingly. Opensource normally follow 3 steps : plan , freeze and RC (API is not good reference for us) Modeling subcommittee may need to align with them in next release. Thank you DENG Hui Thank you, Jessie On Mon, Jun 25, 2018 at 3:15 AM, denghui (L) <denghu...@huawei.com<mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hello Kevin and all I have created a high level requirements wiki page based on the input of Beijing event: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+R3+Modeling+High+Level+Requirements Please help to contribute to the spreadsheet as soon as possible, I also moved Kevin’s draft proposal under this wiki page for your reference: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Casablanca+High+Level+Modeling+Requirements+-+Draft We are going to go through this wiki page this Tuesday, as the basis for our release planning. I will create a separate wiki page for release planning of those requirements accordingly. Thanks a lot DENG Hui -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3274): https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/message/3274 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23037603/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-