Thank you Catherine for your kind comments…
Dear TSC Members, If you guys think we should start with our SI under OOM project umbrella, certainly we will do that. Let’s make a sub-project there for now and then see if and how we can fully integrate with OOM approach… Is that acceptable to you Ladies and Gentlemen of TSC? Thx /robert From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Catherine LEFEVRE Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 12:16 To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Cc: m.pta...@partner.samsung.com Subject: Re: [E] Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP Beijing Offline SI Installer Good morning Robert, Thank you so much Robert for sharing this great contribution. I agree with Stephen and Viswa. It would be great if your activities are covered under the OOM project umbrella. Mike Elliot – how do you feel about this? Many thanks & regards Catherine From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Robert Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 10:11 AM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Cc: m.pta...@partner.samsung.com Subject: Re: [E] Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP Beijing Offline SI Installer Hi Viswa, Yes, agree, we should analyze requirements, impact and scope before deciding if we need new project or not. Certainly, at least requirements sync would be necessary between the two (OOM and SI). And yes, your understanding is right, currently working OOM deployment is necessary for development of SI Package Builder. Btw, Michal Ptacek is participating in Integration project weekly calls, hope they will discuss it there… Thx /robert From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Viswanath Kumar Skand Priya via Lists.Onap.Org Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2018 09:21 To: onap-tsc Cc: m.pta...@partner.samsung.com Subject: Re: [E] Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP Beijing Offline SI Installer Hi Robert, I second the idea of having standalone / offline mode of ONAP installation. It is indeed a requirement for us as we don't really enjoy the luxury of open internet even in our labs. We have similar version of offline repos ( nexus, mvn, cache ) to minimise the dependency on external world and this SI is exactly what we would prefer. However I would like to understand the need for starting a different project or placement under Integration project. As per my understanding, the proposed solution is still based on deploying ONAP via OOM, where the dependencies are downloaded one-time, cached and re-used within local ecosystem. In this case, why can't this project be annexed within OOM project's scope ? BR, Viswa <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.verizon.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=c31OYuaPawMl_ySS_voXJQ&m=It49CjYi0RoW-1_sc1mOTV2I6wzWM-7OWzUV91I51IE&s=7je0LB9jv_vs5HyOsOYbl9IIrDpBxLvWrcUbzzG-lEs&e=> Viswanath Kumar Skand Priya Senior Architect Technology, Architecture & Planning On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 12:36 PM Robert <r.re...@samsung.com> wrote: Hi Steve, We are open for suggestions… IHMO, it would not hurt to have 2 different installers to give options for customers. i.e.: Openstack for example provides multiply installers. Our approach is clearly targeting narrow carrier requirements, where deployments are predictable, repeatable and performed without any external connectivity, additionally giving customers comfort knowing exactly what is deployed. thx /robert From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Terrill Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 20:51 To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] ONAP Beijing Offline SI Installer Hi Robert, Were you thinking of an additional project to capture this, or under the integration project? BR, Steve From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> On Behalf Of r.re...@samsung.com Sent: Tuesday 16 October 2018 16:28 To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-tsc] ONAP Beijing Offline SI Installer Dear ONAP TSC Members, During the ONAP Casablanca Developer Forum in Beijing we have promised to upstream our ONAP offline deployment tool. As of yesterday, finally we did hold to our promise and published SI (Self Installer) in ONAP Supporting Tools wiki: (the delay was due to development of additional the package builder which was initially done manually, and the big self-extracting tarball was not suitable community – over 60GB) <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Beijing-2BOOM-2BONAP-2BOffline-2BDeployment&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=9F3pNUkzjE-2v1eTClkRVakDRN8GH7Bm-wt1lWkxoUyyDORTqf5MxNO_GrMBs0gZ&m=R4fV-lcamj5xlTGrUEFlysFg9mlaHjzY6XNPjRdAqNE&s=FtfUpibQb0z_w_vVyxiVOSS253eMgSiUP6t1SEaqW6A&e=> https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Beijing+OOM+ONAP+Offline+Deployment the code is already merged in Integration project: https://gerrit.onap.org/r/70479 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_70479&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=9F3pNUkzjE-2v1eTClkRVakDRN8GH7Bm-wt1lWkxoUyyDORTqf5MxNO_GrMBs0gZ&m=R4fV-lcamj5xlTGrUEFlysFg9mlaHjzY6XNPjRdAqNE&s=tAX5o1QYvXkSjrOAcX16vkmqZ0zOfPGkLVihjdmPpg0&e=> Core of ONAP offline installer https://gerrit.onap.org/r/70480 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_70480&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=9F3pNUkzjE-2v1eTClkRVakDRN8GH7Bm-wt1lWkxoUyyDORTqf5MxNO_GrMBs0gZ&m=R4fV-lcamj5xlTGrUEFlysFg9mlaHjzY6XNPjRdAqNE&s=vHzECDf94Xbi-efTf0E0_ApfU-1ljoSZVSXchwFSMDo&e=> Add downloading scripts of onap artifacts https://gerrit.onap.org/r/70481 <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gerrit.onap.org_r_70481&d=DwMFaQ&c=udBTRvFvXC5Dhqg7UHpJlPps3mZ3LRxpb6__0PomBTQ&r=9F3pNUkzjE-2v1eTClkRVakDRN8GH7Bm-wt1lWkxoUyyDORTqf5MxNO_GrMBs0gZ&m=R4fV-lcamj5xlTGrUEFlysFg9mlaHjzY6XNPjRdAqNE&s=bGOwgAevM74m00cVfLmeKrttZ9k2kwYp59d4HiupLS0&e=> Add ONAP specific artifacts lists for download Note: current version of offline SI supports only ONAP Beijing release and is script based, for Casablanca we are migrating to Ansible and that will be also up streamed. We would also like to propose to include similar functionality in ONAP as official project (we will follow the formal approval path). Of course current implementation is not suitable for such, but we are planning to submit proposal for ONAP Offline Installer prior Dublin Release Developers Forum to be in time for your review (targeting El Alto release). During the forum, we could also answer all the questions related and listen to your feedback. In the meantime if you do not mind, we’ll open confluence page to start gathering industry and community requirements toward such solution. Thank you very much /robert <http://ext.w1.samsung.net/mail/ext/v1/external/status/update?userid=r.rekas&do=bWFpbElEPTIwMTgxMDE3MDcwNjI0ZXVjYXMxcDI3YmNiMTA3NjlmNTM3YmYzMGRmMGM3NmUzM2FiYjJjMSZyZWNpcGllbnRBZGRyZXNzPW9uYXAtdHNjQGxpc3RzLm9uYXAub3Jn> <http://ext.w1.samsung.net/mail/ext/v1/external/status/update?userid=r.rekas&do=bWFpbElEPTIwMTgxMDE3MDgxMDQ2ZXVjYXMxcDJiODUxN2I4MDQ1MDQ4ODRmYTc1YmI5ODhlYjlhODUxOCZyZWNpcGllbnRBZGRyZXNzPW9uYXAtdHNjQGxpc3RzLm9uYXAub3Jn> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#3925): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/3925 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/27377900/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
