Hello Jim « Ease of Deployment » is important and OOM team (with the community) is working hard to ease the deployment.
The first OVP Program step is only to validate the VNF package/descriptor. There is no need to deploy full ONAP for that. VNF Vendor just need to run VVP or VNFSDK to check their package/descriptor. It is an easy task. We have developed a portal for VVP and DT also proposed their portal to help any vendor to test their VNF using Heat descriptor. To fully test VNF within ONAP and to check the full onboarding, deployment, configuration and closed-loop, they need to deploy a full ONAP. I believe that all ‘main’ vendors have deployed ONAP in their labs. I agree that we must help ‘small’ VNF vendors with ONAP community solutions to avoid them to deploy a full ONAP or we must provide more adapted ONAP deployment to test their VNF managed by ONAP. That is why I advocated from Day0 to get a small footprint for ONAP. Within OOM project, we defined an override file to only deploy a subset of ONAP components to enable on-boarding and deployment. In addition, Orange OpenLab welcomes different VNF vendor that can test their VNF. Best Regards Eric De : onap-tsc@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org] De la part de Jim Baker Envoyé : jeudi 18 avril 2019 20:04 À : onap-tsc Objet : [onap-tsc] ONAP deployment baseline Greeting ONAP TSC, One of my areas of contribution within LFN is on the OVP program. As the OVP program seeks to attract a marketplace of verified VNFs, the developers of the VNFs have the task of completing testing using ONAP. Before they can begin the self-testing work required by the OVP, they need to have deployed ONAP and OpenStack before that<https://onap.readthedocs.io/en/latest/guides/onap-developer/settingup/onap_heat.html#openstack>... My question is: Is "ease of install" a system attribute that we have baselined AND improve upon? My desired outcome from raising this question is to accurately state for VNF developers an estimation of the process time required currently to deploy ONAP AND to understand the interest in the community of investing in "ease of deployment" to improve the end-user experience. Thanks for sharing your thoughts! -- Jim Baker Linux Foundation Networking - Technical Program Manager mobile: +1 970 227 6007 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#4872): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/4872 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/31234067/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
