Hi I participated this afternoon to the various sessions around CNF where there is a lot of activities for this long journey towards managing CNF.
However, I am still confused about the communication about ONAP4K8S and the statement that we should rely on ONAP4K8S to manage CNF in ONAP. We can not state that ONAP4K8 is an ONAP profile. Based on the code available on the ONAP repo https://git.onap.org/multicloud/k8s/tree/deployments/helm/onap4k8s, we can see that ONAP4K8S is not using existing ONAP project. There is a dedicated chart for the deployment not reusing existing ONAP ones (managed by OOM project): https://git.onap.org/multicloud/k8s/tree/deployments/helm/onap4k8s. It is only based on one Docker from multicoud project (multicloud-ks), mongodb, etcd and other common components with no reference to existing official ONAP charts defined in OOM repo. I have no problem if we consider it clearly as a PoC, but we can not claim that is an ONAP profile and the way we communicate on ONAP4K8S is not clear an is very confusing. As an example of "ONAP profile", we can find one for 5G slicing use-case where the use-case team has defined an optimized subset of ONAP components for their slicing use-case: https://git.onap.org/oom/tree/kubernetes/onap/resources/overrides/onap-5g-network-slicing.yaml We really need to clarify this topic. Best Regards Eric ________________________________ De : onap-cnf-taskfo...@lists.onap.org [onap-cnf-taskfo...@lists.onap.org] de la part de Ranny Haiby (Samsung) via lists.onap.org [ranny.haiby=samsung....@lists.onap.org] Envoyé : mardi 21 avril 2020 01:56 À : onap-cnf-taskfo...@lists.onap.org; catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com Objet : Re: [onap-cnf-taskforce] OVP 2.0 - Workstream 7 - ONAP POC and existing development work Hi Catherine, Thanks for defining the scope of WS7. I admit it was not clear to me before, and now it makes much sense. One thing If I may suggest – the phrasing of “Initial experimentations with basic CNF(s)…” sounds a bit non-committal, as if we are not sure if and when we want to support CNFs. How about “Incremental improvements to accommodate for CNF(s) in order to validate…” Regards, Ranny. From: <onap-cnf-taskfo...@lists.onap.org> on behalf of Catherine LEFEVRE <catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com> Reply-To: "onap-cnf-taskfo...@lists.onap.org" <onap-cnf-taskfo...@lists.onap.org>, "catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com" <catherine.lefe...@intl.att.com> Date: Monday, April 20, 2020 at 12:16 PM To: "onap-cnf-taskfo...@lists.onap.org" <onap-cnf-taskfo...@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-cnf-taskforce] OVP 2.0 - Workstream 7 - ONAP POC and existing development work Resent-From: <ranny.ha...@samsung.com> Team, I have tried to define the scope of WS07 track as follows: WS07 Scope: ONAP POCs & Existing Development Work to support CNFs * Initial experimentations with basic CNF(s) in order to validate onboarding, instantiation of multiple CNFs, monitoring, etc. processes * Implement what you learn from ETSI-based CNF support * Pursue our Cloud Native Security journey by leveraging the benefits of a Service Mesh https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/display/LN/OVP+2.0+Workstreams<https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=6f5d5e21-329197a5-6f5cd56e-0cc47aa8f5ba-c8e25d0565acdc71&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.lfnetworking.org%2Fdisplay%2FLN%2FOVP%2B2.0%2BWorkstreams> I have also updated the following wiki - https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=34603941<https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=26cea1db-7b02685f-26cf2a94-0cc47aa8f5ba-1d49586a26fe8cde&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.lfnetworking.org%2Fpages%2Fviewpage.action%3FpageId%3D34603941> I have merged #1 and #5 together. Under item #1 – I have also added the CDS work developed in Frankfurt as suggested by Lucasz Shall I also merge #3 SO with the new #1 cFW POC ? If yes then I can rename #1 as “Initial experimentations with basic CNF(s) in order to validate onboarding, instantiation of multiple CNFs, monitoring processes” So it gives us more time to evaluate the two paths – SO & Multi-Cloud. The OVP Cloud Native session is on day3 so it would be great if we can finalize our WS07 section before that I have also added a note ‘draft version’ so it gives us an opportunity to refine our mind. Thanks in advance for your support. Best regards Catherine _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci. This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law; they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified. Thank you. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#6169): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/6169 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/73203622/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
