Hi Jason, On 05.06.2020 00:13, Jason Hunt wrote: > TSC and PTLs, > Per the discussion in today's TSC meeting, we wanted to make everyone > aware of the ONAP project lifecycle and encourage projects to consider > their status and any changes. > The current lifecycle is depicted in this diagram: > > The suggestion is that we use this lifecycle to place the ONAP project > portfolio into three buckets: > > -*Mature projects:*for projects with active release participation & > solid artifacts; they should submit for a "maturity review" > > - *Inactive (Archived) projects*: for projects where there is no longer > any contributions, they should follow the termination review > > -*Other (Incubation) projects*: for those projects that are still active > but not ready for move to "mature" phase > > For *mature projects*, the TSC encourages qualifying projects to submit > for a maturity review. They do this by filling out the template in the > wiki (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Project+Maturity+Review+Template > <https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=54d370d1-091d739c-54d2fb9e-000babff24ad-19c6b140cc54f247&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.onap.org%2Fdisplay%2FDW%2FProject%2BMaturity%2BReview%2BTemplate>) > > and send an email to the TSC list. In order to accelerate reviews (and > free up time on the TSC calls), we may want to form a working group to > do a preliminary maturity review for the projects. The group > would submit their recommendations to the TSC who would then vote > +1/0/-1 for promotion to the mature phase.
Shouldn't we have any security review before we move project to the mature state? There is no single question regarding security in this template... > > For the*inactive projects*, there is no guidance on who should initiate > a termination review. Because there may not be a PTL, perhaps the TSC > could initiate a termination review for a project. Again, we may want a > working group to conduct the steps of the termination review. This > group should consist of people who are familiar with the project or at > least interface with/depend upon the project. This working group will > need to walk through the steps of the termination review as outlined > here: (scroll down) > > https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/ONAP+Project+and+Component+Lifecycle > <https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=ba539477-e79d973a-ba521f38-000babff24ad-e719a6ce77842878&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.onap.org%2Fdisplay%2FDW%2FONAP%2BProject%2Band%2BComponent%2BLifecycle> > > All other projects need no action. > > Background slide deck on project lifecycle reviews: > https://wiki.lfnetworking.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=25364127&preview=/25364127/28738708/ONAP%20Proj%20Lifecycle%20and%20Review%2015Jan2020%20v1.pdf > > <https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=4b2f2f99-16e12cd4-4b2ea4d6-000babff24ad-5d861846fa71adf4&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fnam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fwiki.lfnetworking.org%252Fpages%252Fviewpage.action%253FpageId%253D25364127%2526preview%253D%252F25364127%252F28738708%252FONAP%252520Proj%252520Lifecycle%252520and%252520Review%25252015Jan2020%252520v1.pdf%26data%3D02%257C01%257Cchaker.al.hakim%2540futurewei.com%257C8a2529fdf0fb43e0b9e108d7f80c6f32%257C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%257C1%257C1%257C637250604601001932%26sdata%3DemcJR3xAixRLzzkLjydj2G57uTiv1pwcYEOr%252BdsNGVQ%253D%26reserved%3D0> > > Please reply with any questions on the process. > > Regards, > Jason Hunt > Distinguished Engineer, IBM > > Phone: +1-314-749-7422 > Email: djh...@us.ibm.com > Twitter: @DJHunt > > -- Krzysztof Opasiak Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#6486): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/6486 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/74681700/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
