Dear TSC, this is a gentle reminder about a below request just to make sure that it didn't got lost.
On 06.07.2020 16:03, Krzysztof Opasiak wrote: > ***DISCLAIMER*** > > I'm not a lawyer. My comments may be biased and imprecise thus if you > have any doubts regarding any of licenses mentioned in this email please > contact your lawyer. > > @Steve > Please correct me if I made any mistake on the licenses described below. > > ***END DISCLAIMER** > > Dear TSC, > > I'd like to kindly ask you to approve or reject usage of packages in > ONAP containers that are licensed under: > > Apache-2.0 - same as ours > > Artistic - "equivalent of GPL" extended beyond software > > GFDL > GFDL-1.2 > GFDL-1.3 - copyleft licenses used for documentation > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Free_Documentation_License) > > GPL-1 - copyleft license (for difference to popular v2 see > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2844055/what-is-the-difference-between-gplv1-to-gplv2-in-simple-words) > > GPL-2 - copyleft license (probably the most popular). Everything that > links with GPL code has to be GPL but you may use it in docker image > without linking and then you code may be under different license but you > need to make sure that users of your software will get the copy of GPL > license and access to the source code that was used to create the binary > > GPL-3 - copyleft license which extends the restrictions put by GPL v2 to > not only provide the source code and license text but also exact > instructions how to replace the given component in your product. Many > companies have concerns regarding this license thus please pay spacial > attention to this one. > > LGPL-2 > LGPL-2.1 > LGPL-3 - used for libraries. The library code is licensed under > particular version of GPL but does not enforce GPL license on the > component that links with it. (unless you modify the library itself) > > MPL-1.1 > MPL-2.0 - mozilla public license > (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mozilla_Public_License) > > OpenSSL License - used in older versions of openssl now openssl uses > apache 2.0 (https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html) > > > There is also a dozen of less popular but usually permissive and widely > accepted licenses: > > BSD > MIT > CC0-1.0 > zlib > boost > OpenLDAP > Python > SISSL > Vim > ISC > > > Best regards, > -- Krzysztof Opasiak Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#6757): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/6757 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/75333278/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
