Dear Kenny, ONAP TSC (or proxies), My apologies for the delayed response. Thank you Kenny for taking the time to capture the changes submitted by the TSC members (or proxies)
I have reviewed the TSC 2.0 proposal, in particular the "TSC 2.0 Draft Edits.pdf". I have the following comments - there are not related to TSC election but should be considered since I have noticed some changes in section we did not review as part of the TSC election The TSC could decide to focus on TSC Election i.e. section 4 to unlock the Election process but it is important to take an action to update the other sections as soon as possible. Here are my comments: * Section 3.3.3.2 "In order to effectively review project progress, four reviews are build-in within the project lifecycle" - Is it correct? Should it not be 5 if we consider the new project state 'unmaintained" and 1 review per project state after the project being approved? * Section 3.3.3.3. Project State "Unmaintained" to be added Definition is provided on Project State: Unmaintained - Developer Wiki - Confluence (onap.org)<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Project+State%3A+Unmaintained>, approved by the TSC previously "Unmaintained: * Project(s) or sub-project(s) is no more part of any official release, but some parts might still be consumed indirectly by other project teams or some functionalities are still needed but no alternative has been implemented yet. * These Project(s) or sub-project(s) are no more subject to non-functional compliances. The level of support will be dependent on the ONAP Community willingness to contribute, fast response time is not guaranteed. * The project will be still part of OOM deployment and High Priority bugs might be fixed to unblock the current and/or maintained releases." * Section 3.3.3.3. To move from one state t o t he next state, the Project Team has to formulate a Kick-Off release review t o t he TSC, by specifying its goal to move up the Project Lifecycle l adder Several From State to State are missing i.e. Incubation to Unmaintained, Core to Unmaintained, Unmaintained to Incubation/Core, Unmaintained to Archived, etc. see the following wiki for additional details - Project State: Unmaintained<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Project+State%3A+Unmaintained> * Section 3.3.6 Need to add the "Unmaintained" Review in alignment with Project State: Unmaintained<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Project+State%3A+Unmaintained> * Section 3.3.7 Mature Release Process - this section should be reviewed and updated in alignment with the new Release process that we have put in place * Section 4.4.2.2.1 - A Coordinator Candidate must be an ONAP active community member otherwise how can she/he represent the ONAP Community while coordinating with SDOs and/or other open source communities? * Section 4.7.4.1 "Voting f or a Chair or Vice-Chair is not limited to ONAP member companies" but only ONAP Active Members must be eligible. Best regards Catherine From: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> On Behalf Of Kenny Paul via lists.onap.org Sent: Saturday, August 21, 2021 12:52 AM To: onap-tsc@lists.onap.org Subject: [onap-tsc] Long Awaited TSC 2.0 Community Document Draft I have uploaded a pdf of the revised document to the wiki for all y'all to review. https://wiki.onap.org/x/VIxkBg<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/wiki.onap.org/x/VIxkBg__;!!BhdT!xIESQUt8rSZoyKho7sPEceespNPJGnpyA336pcecIJNlQVAYGd5ivXhX0aSR4Q$> I won't bore you with a lot of details in this email as I cover all of that on the wiki page. ;-) I'm hoping that we will be able to get closure on this no later than Sept. 9th which will then give us 3 weeks to conduct elections. Thanks! -kenny -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#8060): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/8060 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/85032789/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/21656/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
