Hi all, I waited for 1 hour but nobody sent me the passcode. So @Chaker, could you slip the review for Holmes to another available time slot, please?
The most important thing is to send me the passcode prior to the review to both/either fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn and/or steven20...@gmail.com. Thanks in advance. Best Regards, Guangrong On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:00 PM Guangrong Fu <fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn> wrote: > Hi, > > Could anybody kindly send me the passcode, please? > > Thanks. > > Regards, > Guangrong > > > > > > > 原始邮件 > *发件人：*ChakerAlHakim<calha...@futurewei.com>; > *收件人：*onap-...@lists.onap.org<onap-...@lists.onap.org>; > *抄送人：*onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>; > *日期：*2021-12-13 22:11:28 > *主题：[onap-tsc] ARCCOM: Weekly Meeting Agenda - Dec 14, 2021* > > Team, > > > > The meeting Agenda for the Dec 14 ARCCOM meeting can be accessed here: > https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2021-Dec-14+ONAP+Architecture+Subcommittee+Meeting > > We will continue to review the requirements/changes to the ONAP > Architecture for the Jakarta-R10 release and have 3 presentations scheduled > for this session. > > > > A few additional items to be aware of: > > 1. The Dec 14, 2021 will be the last ARCCOM meeting for the year, The > next meeting is scheduled for Jan-04-2022 > 2. The Jan-11-2022 session has been pushed back to Jan-18-2022 as it > conflicts with the Jan 2022 DDF > 3. We are targeting the completion of all the reviews on Jan-25-2022. > If you have not requested an Architecture review for changes you’re > planning for the Jakarta-R10 release please do so asap. > 4. Per the TSC guidelines discussed at the Dec-09-2021 TSC meeting, we > are asking all the PTLs and project leads to identify any dependencies they > may have on other ONAP components. In order do to that, we have updates > this form: > https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Component+Documentation+Template and > provided a new section (section 4) to list all the dependencies your > respective components have on other components and/or shared services. We > are requesting that all the Sponsors provide this information as part of > their reviews supporting documentation. We are also asking those > PTLs/Sponsors that have already completed their reviews to go back and fill > out the updated wiki form. > 5. The ARCCOM Architecture Review Dashboard > > https://safratech.net/dn3/action_page.php?release=jakarta&doc_type=comp-review > should be up to date and should reflect all the requests we have already > received. If you see any discrepancies please let me know. > > > > Regards, > > Chaker > > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#8345): https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/message/8345 Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/87697951/21656 Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/onap-tsc/leave/2743226/21656/1412191262/xyzzy [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
