On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:27 AM, RA Stehmann <anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de> wrote: > I think we shouldn't invent the wheel twice ;-). > > The OpenOffice.org community has an more or less good working > infrastructure of leads, contact persons, native lang communities, > teams, mailing lists, websites etc.. > > IMO we should make an inventory, keep the usefull elements and drop the > dated. And let persons, who undertake the task of doing something and > who are elected by the OpenOffice.org community, doing their job forward. >
That makes sense to me. But I think this is less about "wearing crowns" and more about "doing". We don't need to give someone the title of "X Lead". But if someone steps up and starts doing X, and does it well, works well in the project, and ensure that decisions occur via consensus on the list, than that person will start taking on the attributes of the de facto "X Lead". We have a request entered with Apache Infrastructure for a wiki to help us with your second point. Once we have the wiki it should be possible to map out a inventory or "site map" of the existing OpenOffice.org web site. So maybe a big table listing each of the subsites or services on OpenOffice.org, along with columns for "migrate/archive/trash", "priority" and "volunteer". Something like that. -Rob
