On Jun 16, 2011, at 9:17 AM, Mathias Bauer wrote: > On 16.06.2011 16:45, Christian Lohmaier wrote: >> Hi *, >> >> (to moderators: I guess the list software used checks on Sender, not >> on From - so if you need to review this message, please add the sender >> address to a "allowed posters" lists for both dev and notifications >> please) >> >> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Marcus Lange<marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote: >>> >>> I would prefer Bugzilla, too. We have already migrated recently to this, so >>> transition would be much easier to bring it into Apache. And because of >>> OOo's project size I would also like to see a new instance. >> >> Not because of project size, but also for the sake of preserving the >> issue-numbers that are spread all over the place, last but not least >> in the code itself. >> >> So whatever you choose, make sure that there is a way to get form >> #i1234# to the actual bug that corresponds to the id. > > Yes, keeping issue ids is the most important thing. Which bug tracker we use > would be a second order priority for me.
There seems to be consensus. (1) We must somehow preserve the old bugzilla ids. (2) There is no clear preference on Bugzilla over JIRA. I think that we need to ask the infrastructure team what they think about the situation. Regards, Dave
