Le 18/06/11 19:43, Dennis E. Hamilton a écrit : Hi Dennis,
> My nosing around so far leads me to believe that this is like the response to > the Facebook "relationship" question: "It's complicated." Until Facebook, I > had no idea how many people said that about their relationships. > > Some sites have explicit CC-share-alike content, some have code that is > apparently derivative of the OpenOffice.org LGPL3 base, and Sun/Oracle made a > mess of the licensing used on and around the openoffice.org site, including a > terms of use that defaults a permissive license that apparently not many > people had ever seen or knew existed. > > I signed up on the wiki.services.openoffice.org wiki just the other day and I > saw no indication of the terms of use, just the lame wiki copyright page. > > In addition, as Jean Weber points out, the on-line user documentation does > have explicit copyright notices. > > Hmm, I haven't nosed into the forums. Or the bugzilla either. Well, it's > complicated. > You have a point. I know that on the OOo French native language project, for example, documents have been published in the past under the Gnu Public Documentation Licence (PDL), the Free Documentation Licence, and I think also various shades of CC. Alex
