On Jul 4, 2011, at 3:04 PM, TJ Frazier wrote: > Hi, Simon, > > On 7/4/2011 17:27, Simon Phipps wrote: >> >> On 4 Jul 2011, at 18:01, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: >> >>> If the Oracle grant (a license) applies to the code at a particular >>> snapshot in time, then I assume that changes to that code after that might >>> not be covered (however covered by the CLA to Oracle/Sun), and certainly >>> anything which involves additional files might not be covered. >> >> While Oracle has expressed general goodwill, their grant at present is in >> the form of an explicit list enumerating what files are covered. We almost >> certainly need to monitor a build of 3.4 to see if that list of files >> includes everything necessary. Whatever repo we run that build on: >> * will include a mix of licensing until the grant from Oracle is updated, >> * is open source so there are no restrictions on our actions >> * is not intended for full release so doesn't break any Apache rules >> As such it doesn't seem to matter much to my naive eyes whether we wait for >> the SVN repo to be built, build from the existing Hg repo (assuming we've >> sufficient access), or do it somewhere else. >> >> I expect I am wrong though, I'm getting used to that :-) >> >> S. >> > Without being able to view the private agreement, I'd like to mention a > couple of off-beat items which I hope are included: > > 1) UNOIDL - that is, the Unified Network Object Interface Description > Language compiler, which produces the content of api.oo.o, and the input > files.
I hope so that information needs to build into the website. Some configuration will be needed. > 2) The OpenSymbol font. The Math Engine (TeX-like) depends heavily on it, and > it may be used elsewhere in OO.o. There should be license information in the font metadata. What does it say? Regards, Dave > Hope I'm worrying over nothing. > -- > /tj/ > > T. J. Frazier > Melbourne, FL > > (TJFrazier on OO.o) >
