On 10 August 2011 15:37, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: > That wasn't me. My view is we don't mess with notices (or their absence) and > licenses until after we have guidance from legal-/license-discuss, not the > other way around. This is not a CtR deal in my opinion.
Apologies for misrepresenting your position - unintentional of course. > Also, apparently an Apache Terms of Use for web sites is forthcoming, and we > are definitely in need of that and how it applies to a third-party site that > we propose to migrate/operate. Perhaps someone here at OO.o can go over to the legal-discuss@ list and offer to push this forwards. "forthcoming" in the ASF can sometimes mean that it has been agreed that it is needed and we're waiting for someone to take the lead. I'm not sure if that is the case here, but a quick question on legal-discuss will reveal all. Ross > > - Dennis > > PS: Thanks for the analysis, Ross. It aligns with my limited experience with > Apache and the available materials. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 05:07 > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: [www] Color me Copyright-confused > > [ ... ] > > Note that I've snipped the bit where Denis says he intends to run it > past legal once everything is in place. So it is safe to sit and wait > unless you are worried. > > Ross > > -- Ross Gardler (@rgardler) Programme Leader (Open Development) OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
