On Sun, 2011-09-04 at 11:03 -0700, Joe Schaefer wrote: > Drew, > > To the best of my ability I am trying to express > the true concerns of the org, as I have come to > know them over my time here. At this time I don't > see the need for any major changes to the status > quo (if it ain't broke don't fix it). Just trying > to convey what the organizational requirements actually > are, not to insist that anything be done to accomodate > them *right now*. > > > Of course it'd be smart to allow anyone from the > infrastructure team to inspect those forums, but as > a practical matter most of us are already members of > the org. And I take Terry's offer towards ooo > committers at face-value that it is a standing offer > good for the lifetime of the project.
Yes and I'll back it up also, actually it is like that for everyone - Anyone - if they are active on the forum can gain membership in that group. The volunteer group is already 75 people..nothing happens at the forums that this group does not have access to. //drew
