On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: > I think it is inappropriate to make web visible duplicate and different pages > that are presently available via the OpenOffice.org. There is much more to > determine before the migration of the OpenOffice.org content and services is > staged. There is no worked-out consensus on how that will progress through > integration so that user-facing OpenOffice.org and project facing > openoffice.apache.org are separated appropriately, if at all. > > More important to me is that fact that those pages don't "belong" to us. >
Are you sure? These are the static website pages per project: http://openoffice.org/projects/native-lang In order to check these in, the person who created these files would have needed to sign and return the OOo contributor agreement. So Oracle has the ability to set a ALv2 on these. I know this is not true in all cases for all content on the OOo website, especially wiki content. But don't you see how it is true in this specific case? Or am I missing something? -Rob