Interesting ...

We carry an older version of saxon but we don't
carry saxon9-dom.jar

Newer versions of saxon don't carry saxon9-dom either.

Try getting Saxon-B from http://saxon.sourceforge.net/

cheers,

Pedro.

--- On Tue, 9/13/11, Herter, Scott <scott.her...@napersoft.com> wrote:
...
> We have been using OpenOffice in the
> past to convert RTF documents to PDF and to print
> them.  We have upgraded and after updating the Jar
> files in our EAR file we now get an exception:
> 
> 2011-09-13 10:58:19,725 ERROR [STDERR]
> (http-0.0.0.0-8080-1) Error   DOMSource
> cannot be processed: check that saxon9-dom.jar is on the
> classpath
> 2011-09-13 10:58:19,725 ERROR [STDERR]
> (http-0.0.0.0-8080-1) net.sf.saxon.trans.XPathException:
> DOMSource cannot be processed: check that saxon9-dom.jar is
> on the classpath
> 2011-09-13 10:58:19,725 ERROR [STDERR]
> (http-0.0.0.0-8080-1)   at
> net.sf.saxon.event.Sender.send(Sender.java:226)
> 2011-09-13 10:58:19,725 ERROR [STDERR]
> (http-0.0.0.0-8080-1)   at
> net.sf.saxon.IdentityTransformer.transform(IdentityTransformer.java:29)
> 2011-09-13 10:58:19,725 ERROR [STDERR]
> (http-0.0.0.0-8080-1)   at
> com.napersoft.databases.R70.NRUtils.decodeXML(NRUtils.java:1160)
> ...
> 
> Without the OpenOffice 3.3 jar files that code works fine,
> with the 3.3 Jar files it fails with the message
> above.  The code being invoked has nothing to do with
> OpenOffice, it has to do with formatting some XML for
> display.  I noticed that there is a saxon9.jar as part
> of the 3.3 jars and that is included in the manifest as a
> jar file dependency and it is bundled with the EAR
> file.  It is like some of the Jar files are replacing
> or interfering with the javax.xml.* packages provided by
> JBoss.
> 
> Is there some minimal set of 3.3 jars I can use?  Most
> of the time we are loading an RTF document and converting it
> to PDF or printing it.  We also use cursors to search
> for bookmarks and insert page breaks as well as get a page
> count.
> 
> Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>

Reply via email to