On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:05 PM, drew <d...@baseanswers.com> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:39 -0700, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > > > > --- On Tue, 9/27/11, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > As Rob Weir has put it ... > > ... > > > > > > > > So obviously there is limited volunteer bandwidth to > > > > migrate the wiki. > > > > And I've heard from several people, on and off > > > > the list, that much of what is on the wiki is > > > > not very useful. > > > > > > > > > > uh, well...I don't know bout this. I was under the > > > impression that MUCH of developer info was here. > > > Others would need to weigh in but I think it was > > > widely used because of the ease of use. > > > > > Just my word of advice: > > > > Check the MediaWiki at http://ooo-wiki.apache.org/ > > > > If we take out information about Hg (dead), > > the Development Teams and Projects (which will have to > > be reorganized), Old News, the issue tracker ... > > > > Is the information left worth it to run through a > > MW-->CWiki conversion effort? > > > > I think given the license situation we should just > > leave that stuff as read-only for now and do all new > > work on CWiki > > IMo someone needs to find out who user Hohenheim on the current wiki is > and get them to stop adding pages, cause it looks like the last couple > of hundred new pages all come form that account and all in the last > couple of weeks. > > it may be that if you got that person to move the pages over to cwiki, > that the read-only version of MW is up to date with the older version > already. > > > @Alexandro - do you know who this is? > > //drew > > Yes he is one of our interns, and not only him. I asked about this situation a few weeks ago but there was no reply on this topic.
-- *Alexandro Colorado* *OpenOffice.org* EspaƱol http://es.openoffice.org fingerprint: E62B CF77 1BEA 0749 C0B8 50B9 3DE6 A84A 68D0 72E6