Boo! Pretty stupid mistake on my part! Can you test the original file?
http://www.twain.org/devfiles/twain.h I suspect no hacking is necssary. Thanks! Pedro. --- On Tue, 11/1/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile <ariel.constenla.ha...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Ariel Constenla-Haile <ariel.constenla.ha...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: [code] [issue 118517] Twain header update for testing > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Date: Tuesday, November 1, 2011, 1:12 AM > Hi Pedro, > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 03:12:42PM -0700, Pedro Giffuni > wrote: > > Hi again; > > > > I waited for a while but I didn't get any report on > how > > well (or bad) the new twain header works while > building > > on Windows. I am pretty sure the authors take care of > > GCC and most commercial compilers so the only special > > case is mingw32. > > > > Ming32 is something that was indeed hacked into our > old > > header so I adapted the code to suit our previous > behavior > > and now that I have something robust I have committed > it. > > I did everything I could to ensure this works but I am > not > > perfect, and there has been little feedback, so > please > > don't panic and let me know if something related with > > scanners changes. > > I didn't test scanning, but building breaks: > > ifdef defined(TWH_CMP_MING32) > #pragma pack (push, 2) > #elif TWH_CMP_MSC > > see attached patch. > > Regards > -- > Ariel Constenla-Haile > La Plata, Argentina >
