On Nov 3, 2011, at 9:25 AM, Rob Weir wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:06 PM, David McKay <dmc...@btconnect.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On 30/10/11 00:17, Mark Thomas wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 29/10/2011 20:39, TJ Frazier wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Hi, Mark, et al.,
>>>> 
>>>> Please note the very strange date on this BZ message, which just came
>>>> in. I would have expected today's date.
>>> 
>>> It is a known bug in Bugzilla [1] that should get fixed when we next
>>> upgrade.
>>> 
>>>> There may be another small problem with this (email) method of getting
>>>> problems fixed: others who need to know may not be informed.
>>> 
>>> I'm not sure I follow you here. The only change has been the addition of
>>> the ooo-issues addressee. Everything else is exactly as it was prior to
>>> the move to the ASF.
>>> 
>>>> I am trying to fix that with the CC and Reply-to headers. --/tj/
>>> 
>>> Again, I don't follow you here. You don't have the ability to modify the
>>> reply to headers that are used with these e-mails. Neither do I get what
>>> you are trying to achieve.
>>> 
>>> Mark
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643910
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> Hi Mark,
>> 
>> As part of my current day job I am the administrator for our in-house
>> bugzilla instance. If you think I can be of assistance to with the AOO
>> Bugzilla, I'd be pleased to help.
>> 
> 
> Thanks for the offer, Dave.   Do you currently have admin access to
> our BZ instance?  If not, and if there are no objections (we can wait
> 24 hours to make sure) then you should enter a JIRA issue with Infra
> to get added.

+1.

> 
> -Rob
> 
>> Regards, Dave.
>> 

Reply via email to